Did the Court of Appeal s for the Thi rd Ci rcuit so far depart from the accepted
and usual course of judi cial proceedi ngs, or sancti oned such a departure by a l ower
court when i t failed to award the Peti tioner a new tri al as the resul t of error i n the
District Court where the Court al lowed the government to i ntroduce expert wi tness
testimony i n the form of l ay wi tness testi mony?

Did the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit err in failing to award the Petitioner a new trial due to the District Court's error in allowing the government to introduce expert witness testimony in the form of lay witness testimony?