1. DID THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ABUSE ITS DISCRETIONARY, BROADLY-BASED AUTHORITY OF INTERPRETATION, THUS, VIOLATING PETITIONER'S FOURTH, FIFTH, SIXTH, EIGHTH, AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT(S), BY INCORRECTLY MIS-INTERPRETING UNITED STATES V. WATSON, 423 U.S. 411 (1976 - CONTRARY TO U.S. SUPREME COURT INTENTION?

2. DID THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ERR IN DENYING THE MOTION TO SUPRESS EVIDENCE WHERE THE SHERIFF'S WARRANTLESS ARREST VIOLATED PETITIONER'S FOURTH AMENDMENT

3. DID THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA'S DENTAL OF SUPPRESSION OF THE SEARGI OF THE GREEN STREET RESIDENCE IN ERROR BECAUSE NO VALID CONSENT WAS PROVIDED BY EITHER PETITIONER, OR THE RESIDENT'S OWNER, MS. ASHLEY SMITH, THUS GROSSLY VIOLATING PETITIONER'S FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHT(S)?

4. DID THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IMPERMISSIBLY ALLOW DETECTIVE DAVID LAU TO TESTIFY AS BOTH A FACT WITNESS, AND EXPERT WITNESS, AND WITHOUT PROVIDING ANY APPROPRIATE, CAUTIONARY INSTRUCTIONS TO THE JURY?

5. DID THE UNIFED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ERR IN INCORRECTLY APPLYING THE TWO (2) LEVEL OBSTRUCTION

Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit abuse its discretionary, broadly-based authority of interpretation, thus, violating petitioner's Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment right(s), by incorrectly mis-interpreting United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 (1976 - contrary to U.S. Supreme Court intention?