posse-comitatus
4 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23-6709 | Martin Akerman v. United States | District of Columbia | 2024-02-09 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | actual-innocence detention-challenge due-process escape-hatch-provision federal-detention habeas-corpus posse-comitatus standing statutory-interpretation | 1. Does the Chief Data Officer of the National Guard, appointed under 44 U.S.C. § 3520, with standing under 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(1) and (c)(2), and det… |
| 23-6710 | Martin Akerman v. Sherri Doiron | District of Columbia | 2024-02-09 | Denied | Relisted (2)IFP | 28-usc-2254 constitutional-rights federal-authority habeas-corpus jurisdiction military-custody military-jurisdiction posse-comitatus procedural-standards | 1. Does the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia have jurisdiction over a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 when the petition… |
| 24A430 | Martin Akerman v. National Guard Bureau | District of Columbia | Denied | due-process federal-detention judicial-review military-authority national-security posse-comitatus | Are state military officers from Arizona, Nevada, and Arkansas allowed to be federalized to detain the tenured Chief Data Officer of an Agency, under … | ||
| 24A507 | Martin Akerman v. Merit Systems Protection Board, et al. | District of Columbia | Denied | due-process judicial-oversight national-security posse-comitatus userra whistleblower-protection | Does the whistleblower protection provision of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), codified at 38 U.S.C. § 4311(b)… |