Names v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520, 92 S. -Ct. 594, 30 L. Ed. 2d 652 (1972), allows a court unfettered authority to construe pro se prisoner claims. Should there be a precedent from the Court that protects pro se prisoners' right to contest misconstrued of pro Se claims?

Does equal protection under the law and equal access to the court require pro se prisoners be afforded a full and fair opportunity to contest misconstrued pro se prisoner claims?

When state rules and practices block pro se prisoners from contesting misconstrued pro se claims, should there be a precedent from the Court that protects equal protection under the law and equal access to the court?

Should there be a precedent from the Court that protects pro-se-prisoners' right to contest misconstrued-of-pro-se-claims?