1. What if district court abused its discretion by not relying on the erroneous legal premise that a citizen(s) of the state of Louisiana and this great country deserves a fair trial by jury?

2. Why couldn't evidence to be presented in a timely manner as stated in the constitution, would appellant and citizen(s) open to attacks, injuries, and other hateful actions brought on by Appellee(s) and others?

3. Assuming - if this Court of our country would have properly addressed this matter the outcome would have been resulted, by evidence presented to trail and jurors. In failing to properly comply with its own laws and rules of the United States of America appellant was force to file appeal.

What if district court abused its discretion by not relying on the erroneous legal premise that a citizen(s) of the state of Louisiana and this great country deserves a fair trial by jury?