Sobhy Iskander, a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis r extraordinary circumstance moves this motion on a writ of certi- orari that a state court decision is contrary to federal law based on ihe principle that an independent , fair, and competent judiciary will interpret and apply the laws that governs us. The role of the judiciary is central to americans concept of justice and the role of iawjL intrinsic to this code are the precepts that Judges individually collectively , must respect and honor the judicial office as a public t and strive to enhance and maintain confidence in our legal system. A J.idqe is an arbiter of facts and law for the resolution of disputes a highly visible member of government under rules of law. In performance of their dunes as prescribed by law, they shall e precedence over all writ, brief, exhibits, letters, petitions nitted by the people, and they shall be faithful to the law regardless of partisan, public clamor, or fear of critism, and shall maintiari prfessional competence in the law. Petitioner sobhy Iskander has fifteen (15) cogent reasons which are supported by facts and evidence on the Supplement Page (Reason for Granting the Writ), and which strongly suggest that this court to give full consideration on constitutional claims which are debatable among jurists of reason.Petitioner's brief demonstrate that actual term of confinement cannot be ministerally decided no matter what kind of twist the judiciary system invent to rule and regulations retroactive applied or qreated.To overturn the violation of basic constitutional rights sonable application of united States Supreme Court's law by federal 's decision was wrong.

Whether the state court decision is contrary to federal law based on the principle of an independent, fair, and competent judiciary