Nathaniel Waugh v. A. Ralph, et al.
Court proceeded (l auordt^ -}o Justice" Or deprived p^frfioner o-f0) whiMitr lower
'■S^Ws-farrtW rights?
CX) k ^editr
Congress J * ^ o4^ [auf Conducted Strgk, Mission rU>nj uj/H, aut the a.vhc'P
Q) wlned4itr circuit'tov-rt procedures VtolzhJ 'Principles 0~f /c,uj -Hereby IrCeQular) WlldUr Constitution doinstitutes id" 4s 4 pAifOfiUc mi$e&rri^c crF"dug+i'ceT
C&> kiiie+k 6lr lower
*^ + ^ -+U UrtKr,proceed irg* ,
CowH- applied -f^c wro^ ru|t 0f |ftw ^ -fl*. evidence?
"H "fhc l«w or essejrhfui 1bdflr- I h 4^ owny '^a5
Cl) \Alhdhr -b
•* p4^T*rt,r^ €rrar Ci/^ztz^ J « ?^ PU of Uu, rwuH,^ „ Mi,« rrl-yt ^ Juificc 7
u pnr;'lj £4""mcj ^ or«u, i* toltd "T"-* <«* ■.. M4f£ ^Wr -h flffl Jj '" 8ro4s °f J«+K<2/r«r
^«p*W uH c <
^ ^Mher d^p^/diirc "Pro
feroed icbi
OV wu+w
+» Spec'.p,rv\ '^•3S&n'h<^(
ppe<X . P-CViewctUc br^ww/rf, «f l<« ^ustJ ;rre(3<refc ,£ • ,
^ ce.rttorar> P v/«- on a.
p^,+/o«. a|M»«#h*W «.«rd» +W arvbUoo on^ , J
collj noiiroos Jtporiuro Jnm retiremcoU of Uu7 " °^C'
(.11) pe+rlii^r ^ussbons -fU pnorrfy erf « -fr,'<J h
v5pecclvj ■frioj^ ?
(V2.) Whed'Jer or riot -He $pec44ccf<W clhfit* Cn 6-pfcnj'c uindc^ A<d~*cd^ 3^?
|3) vJkethtir (nr m& fhflf \s provide fo )xl/t^ Accused 4vn,*/*f eJ offe**
&. Infixed 7
0H> Whditr ir n<t+k 6iv«n,Vu eu^.ri'+y Iwi £»urf-r«<u4,^ TuruJ.of,-
aotwei ^ #Wu
Whether lower Court proceeded 'according to Justice' or deprived petitioner of fundamental Substantial rights?