| 25-6763 |
Frederick Pina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
California |
2026-02-10 |
Pending |
IFP |
appellate-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-taking property-rights vexatious-litigant |
1. Whether a state appellate court effects a deprivation of property without due process of law, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, when it dis… |
| 25A857 |
John Paul Gomez v. David Ryan, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2026-01-30 |
Application |
|
civil-rights dismissal judicial-procedure pro-se section-1983 vexatious-litigant |
Question not identified. |
| 25-881 |
Christopher Hadsell v. Catherine Isham |
California |
2026-01-23 |
Pending |
|
constitutional-challenge court-access due-process fundamental-rights judicial-procedure vexatious-litigant |
1. Are States'! Vexatious-Litigant Law ("States' VL Law'), and specifically, California's VexatiousLitigant Law ("CA VL Law', Cal. Code Civ. Proc.? §§… |
| 25-5559 |
Fareed Sepehry-Fard v. Superior Court of California, Santa Clara County, et al. |
California |
2025-09-05 |
Dismissed |
Relisted (2)IFP |
bankruptcy due-process land-patents supremacy-clause treaty-law vexatious-litigant |
1. Did the lower court violate Article VI Clause 2 as to the
Supremacy Clause of Federal Constitution in relation to Land
Patents and treaty laws on… |
| 24-6711 |
Kris Chapter Jackson v. Soave Automotive Group, Inc., et al. |
Kansas |
2025-03-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure constitutional-challenge due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-review vexatious-litigant |
Petition to review a "constitutional question".
Petitioner contends that the lower court 's decision has
incorrectly interpreted or applied a provis… |
| 24-873 |
Angela W. DeBose v. United States, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2025-02-14 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
jury-trial preliminary-injunction rule-12b6 rule-65 temporary-restraining-order vexatious-litigant |
(1) Whether the "with " and/or "without " notice rules of Rule 65 for a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order require a hearing?
(2) … |
| 24A501 |
Christine Reule, et al. v. Austin Reeve Jackson, Judge, District Court of Texas, 114th District, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-11-20 |
Presumed Complete |
|
constitutional-challenge due-process judicial-procedure pro-se-litigation standing-doctrine vexatious-litigant |
Question not identified. |
| 24-467 |
Christopher Hadsell v. Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2024-10-25 |
Denied |
|
access-to-courts constitutional-challenge due-process fundamental-rights state-interest vexatious-litigant |
1. Is California's Vexatious Litigant Law ("CA VL Law", Cal. Code Civ. Proc.! §§391-391.8) unconstitutional facially because it is not narrowly tailor… |
| 24A366 |
Angela Dubose v. United States, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-10-18 |
Presumed Complete |
|
discovery-stay due-process injunction judicial-procedure preliminary-hearing vexatious-litigant |
Question not identified. |
| 24A342 |
Robert Emert v. Andrea Schuck |
California |
2024-10-10 |
Presumed Complete |
|
access-to-courts due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment pro-se-litigation vexatious-litigant |
Question not identified. |
| 24A169 |
Arthur Lopez v. Court of Appeal of California, et al. |
California |
2024-08-12 |
Presumed Complete |
|
civil-procedure court-access judicial-restriction legal-filing pro-se vexatious-litigant |
Question not identified. |
| 24A168 |
Arthur Lopez v. Court of Appeal of California, et al. |
California |
2024-08-12 |
Presumed Complete |
|
court-access judicial-review pro-se procedural-rights vexatious-litigant writ-of-mandate |
Question not identified. |
| 24A152 |
Arthur Lopez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2024-08-08 |
Presumed Complete |
|
appellate-review court-access judicial-discretion pro-se procedural-due-process vexatious-litigant |
Question not identified. |
| 24-140 |
Raymond H. Pierson, III v. Northern California Collection Service, Inc., et al. |
California |
2024-08-07 |
Denied |
|
access-to-courts due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment separation-of-powers vexatious-litigant |
1. Litigiousness or Numerosity of Litigations Alone is Insufficient to Support the Determination that a Self-Represented Party is a Vexatious Litigant… |
| 24A8 |
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. International Business Machines Corporation, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2024-07-08 |
Presumed Complete |
|
constitutional-vagueness due-process federal-circuit judicial-discretion patent-litigation vexatious-litigant |
1. Whether the Federal Circuit's Order is not void for vagueness. What is a "vexatious" litigant? Not defined and therefore has not been proven.
2. W… |
| 23-1251 |
Paula Bourne, et vir v. Banner University Medical Center Phoenix, LLC |
Arizona |
2024-05-30 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-bias medical-malpractice standing vexatious-litigant |
1. Did the Arizona Court of Appeals errantly affirm and allow Arizona Superior Court to designate Bourne's vexatious litigants and dismiss their case … |
| 23A881 |
Linda Baldwin v. Robert Pitman, Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-04-04 |
Presumed Complete |
|
civil-rights constitutional-challenge in-forma-pauperis judicial-bias pro-se-litigation vexatious-litigant |
Question not identified. |
| 23-6362 |
Gregory Steshenko v. Foothill-De Anza Community College District, et al. |
California |
2023-12-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
backpropagation-doctrine civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-access due-process finality interlocutory-appeals standing vexatious-litigant |
Whether the interlocutory decisions of the federal courts - especially, those appealed under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 - ever become the final determinations?
… |
| 23-313 |
Angela DeBose v. University of South Florida, Board of Trustees, et al. |
Florida |
2023-09-27 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
civil-procedure constitutional-error due-process ex-post-facto injunction-order small-claims standing standing-to-appeal statutory-interpretation vexatious-litigant |
(1) Whether an Injunction Order rendered under Florida
Vexatious Litigant Law, Florida Statute § 68.093(2)(a),
requires reversal where it is:
(a) ap… |
| 22-6875 |
Yvonne Jiang v. Helen Xu, et al. |
California |
2023-02-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
abuse-of-power civil-rights conspiracy constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-conspiracy judicial-misconduct vexatious-litigant |
1. California Constitution and its Rules of Court confer too much power to its Chief Justice that when the Chief Justice conspires with the people who… |
| 22-6701 |
In Re Astarte Davis |
|
2023-02-03 |
Denied |
IFP |
abuse-of-discretion accountability civil-rights color-of-law constitutional-rights due-process judicial-ethics judicial-misconduct public-importance vexatious-litigant |
1. Whether the Respondents decisions in Astarte's case is non-judicial conduct under color of law and constitution, failed in their judicial ethics, a… |
| 22-6373 |
Alicja Z. Herriott v. Paul Barrett Herriott |
California |
2022-12-22 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment government-redress petition-clause right-to-petition vexatious-litigant |
InBe&K Constr. Co. v. NLRB (2002) 536 U.S. 516, 53, this Court held that "The First Amendment provides, in relevant part, that "Congress shall make no… |
| 22-5932 |
Nick Casavelli, et ux. v. Donna Johanson, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Gary T. Johanson, Deceased |
Arizona |
2022-10-28 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
access-to-justice administrative-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-preemption legislative-standard service-of-process standing state-legislation substantive-review vexatious-litigant |
Can states pass laws that challenge the power of Congress to regulate constitutional rights?
If the State of Arizona can legally apply the Arizona Re… |
| 22-322 |
Zia Shaikh v. Madeline F. Einbinder, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2022-10-06 |
Denied |
|
access-to-courts civil-rights de-novo-review due-process first-amendment judicial-immunity section-1915 standing vexatious-litigant |
1. Did the Third Circuit err in not doing a De Nova Review of the Federal District Court Dismissal Order when the dismissal was pertaining to 28 USC 2… |
| 22-5773 |
Roland Ma v. Gallery Belltown Condo Association |
Washington |
2022-10-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure court-order due-process judicial-procedure notice-and-opportunity-to-object notice-requirement standing sua-sponte vexatious-litigant |
(1) Whether both the State's supreme court and the State's trial court erred by entering a
sua sponte vexatious litigant order, without notice and an… |
| 22-276 |
Aparna Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services, et al. |
Utah |
2022-09-23 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
appellate-review civil-procedure contempt due-process jurisdictional-challenge rule-11 rule-83 safe-harbor vexatious-litigant |
1. Whether application of the contempt analysis
associated with Utah R. Civ. P. 11 sanctions to
review a Utah R. Civ. P. 83 Vexatious Litigant
orde… |
| 22-5501 |
In Re Eric Drake |
|
2022-09-02 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights court-access due-process first-amendment prefiling-injunction pro-se-litigation sanctions state-courts vexatious-litigant |
Under the First Amendment, every U.S. citizen has a right of speech (right to petition), and 42 USC §1981 (right to sue, give evidence, to be parties … |
| 22-5482 |
William Paul Burch v. Homeward Residential Incorporated |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-09-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
bankruptcy-court due-process in-forma-pauperis non-article-iii-judge removal-court removal-jurisdiction removal-time-limit rooker-feldman-doctrine state-court-appeals thirty-day-window vexatious-litigant |
If a petition is filed in state district court and results in a default judgment and is appealed by the defendant to the state court of appeals which … |
| 22-5425 |
William Paul Burch v. Bank of America, N.A. |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-08-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
article-iii-court civil-procedure constitutional-challenge court-removal federal-jurisdiction in-forma-pauperis pro-se-litigation removal sanction-fees sanctions vexatious-litigant |
Should removal from a state court to a federal court by a defendant only be allowed after the state court judge conducts a hearing to determine if the… |
| 22-5254 |
William Paul Burch v. Mark X. Mullen |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-08-02 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
article-iii bankruptcy-judge constitutional-violation federal-rules in-forma-pauperis sanction-fees unconstitutional-order vexatious-litigant |
There are no vexatious litigant rules or statutes currently in effect in Federal law, only in state statutes. Therefore, can a non-Article III bankrup… |
| 22-5008 |
Anthony A. Patel v. Sonya Bhatia |
California |
2022-06-30 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure court-authority due-process judicial-authority judicial-discretion martial-law settlement settlement-agreement sua-sponte-sanctions vexatious-litigant |
May courts impose sua sponte punishments against litigants in cases which were already settled as a matter of law? |
| 21-1493 |
James Joseph Knochel v. Amy Fackrell, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-05-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3) |
civil-rights due-process evidentiary-hearing fraud-on-court habeas-corpus next-friend standing vexatious vexatious-litigant whitmore-standard |
#1 - Does Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149, require an evidentiary hearing before dismissing a next friend's petition for writ of habeas corpus, or … |
| 21-7947 |
Cedric Greene v. Harbor Police, et al. |
California |
2022-05-24 |
Denied |
IFP |
amendment-interpretation case-records civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process judicial-immunity legal-standards punitive-damages rights-protection standing vexatious-litigant |
To thee attention of how things are meant to be governed. When a series of Judicial standards known as judges speak for the blind scale of justice. Wh… |
| 21-7902 |
Marc Anthony Lowell Endsley v. California |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-05-18 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus judicial-discretion legal-remedy procedural-bar standing vexatious-litigant writ-denial |
Can a vexatious litigant order be used to deny a writ of habeas corpus? |
| 21-939 |
Peter Beasley v. Society of Information Management, Dallas Area Chapter, et al. |
Texas |
2021-12-27 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment race-discrimination racial-discrimination standing vexatious-litigant |
Whether Texas courts may discriminate against Black people in violation of Due Process and Equal Protection guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment thr… |
| 21-904 |
Charles G. Kinney v. United States, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-12-20 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-act civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process judicial-immunity malicious-prosecution ministerial-act rico rico-elements vexatious-litigant whistle-blower |
Here, judges intentionally abused a "ministerial " act to conceal or cover-up that other judges had intentionally abused an "administrative " act to e… |
| 21-881 |
Linda Shao v. McManis Faulkner, LLP |
California |
2021-12-14 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
appeal appellate-procedure civil-procedure conflicts-of-interest court-jurisdiction due-process filing judicial-bias procedural-irregularity vexatious-litigant |
1. Was Petitioner denied due process by the summary denial of Petitioner's application for leave to file appeal where the application had been previou… |
| 21-668 |
Charles G. Kinney v. United States, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-11-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
abuse-of-process civil-procedure due-process ftca ftca-exception judicial-immunity malicious-prosecution pre-filing-order vexatious-litigant whistle-blower-rights |
Can the "law enforcement proviso" exception to the FTCA's exclusion of intentional torts by law enforcement officers (acting within the scope of their… |
| 21-5864 |
Deloris Phillips v. Columbia Luxar |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-10-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights court-system due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment judicial-discretion sanctions vexatious-litigant |
1) Whether it is unconstitutional, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment-
Equal Protection Clause, for any litigant alleging discrimination in the… |
| 21-5300 |
In Re Richard Charles Lussy |
|
2021-08-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure due-process estate-litigation extrinsic-fraud fraud mandamus mandamus-petition ministerial-duty oath-of-office probate-dispute vexatious-litigant |
Question not identified. |
| 21-5134 |
Wayne R. Reiner v. Cox Communications California, LLC |
California |
2021-07-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
case-dismissal case-review ccp-391 civil-procedure court-sanctions due-process frivolous-claims judicial-discretion legal-standing vexatious-litigant |
In Orange County Superior Court case Reiner was determined to be a vexatious Plaintiff under CCP 391. The Court had reviewed and determined that 7 cas… |
| 21-55 |
Genet McCann v. Ward E. Taleff, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-07-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights court-integrity due-process fraud judicial-integrity judicial-misconduct legal-standards ninth-circuit rule-11 rule-of-law standing vexatious-litigant |
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit 's departure from "the settled course of
antecedent principles " in disregard of this Court 's and its own well-establis… |
| 20-1435 |
Glenn Galvan v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC |
Nevada |
2021-04-14 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure compulsory-counterclaim constitutional-rights court-discretion deed-of-trust due-process foreclosure-proceedings mortgage-assignment procedural-due-process standing vexatious-litigant |
1. Whether all Nevada Courts abused their discretion and made errors in fact and in misapplying the court rules by not ruling if the State Court Proce… |
| 20-1102 |
Michael James Hanna v. Little League Baseball, Inc. |
California |
2021-02-10 |
Denied |
|
access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process pro-se-litigant standing vexatious-litigant |
Whether California's vexatious litigant statute unconstitutionally deprives a litigant of due process and access to the courts, by declaring a pro se … |
| 20-7051 |
Tomas Zavalidroga v. United States District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Second Circuit |
2021-02-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-speech iccpr pro-se-litigant standing vexatious-litigant |
Whether the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) pro… |
| 20-1037 |
Wanda Bowling v. John Roach |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-01-29 |
Denied |
|
11th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights court-conflict due-process fifth-circuit judicial-immunity judicial-precedent legal-remedy prefiling-injunction standing vexatious-litigant |
1. Whether the Fifth Circuit 's panel 's opinion is in direct conflict with its own
previous decisions, other U.S. Court of Appeals, and with the U.S… |
| 19-7990 |
Gabriel L. Roman v. Sarah H. Kim, et al. |
California |
2020-03-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
california-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process first-amendment free-speech legal-access standing vexatious-litigant |
Whether the California Vexatious Litigant Statute is Unconstitutional |
| 19-7921 |
Floyd Dewaine Scott v. Superior Court of California, Monterey County |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-03-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights court-access due-process evidentiary-hearing habeas-corpus judicial-bias recusal vexatious-litigant void-judgment |
1] Is it contrary to clearly established laws for to knowingly use Court Cases thatan Attorney were never Filed or Commenced, or Maintained to use as … |
| 19-7829 |
Dale E. Phillips v. South Coast Plaza, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-03-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights civil-rights-discrimination class-action constitutional-rights diversity-jurisdiction due-process equal-protection in-forma-pauperis jurisdiction pro-se-litigation standing state-actor vexatious-litigant |
Whether California's Vexatious Litigant Laws
(CCP § 391(b)) violate the 1st, 8th and 14th
Amendments of the US Constitution, particularly
when a gover… |
| 19-7814 |
Alicia Herriott v. Paul Herriott |
California |
2020-03-02 |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment access-to-court appeal-dismissal civil-procedure civil-rights common-law-protection due-process privileges-and-immunities recall-remittitur standing statutory-law vexatious-litigant |
In Honda Motor Co., Ltd. v. Oberg, 512 U.S. 415 (1994) this Court has not hesitated to find proceedings violative of due process where a party has bee… |
| 19-7766 |
Guillermo Garcia v. B. A. Lacey, et al. |
California |
2020-02-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
california-law categorical-approach civil-procedure civil-rights due-process legal-enforcement standing statutory-interpretation vagueness vexatious-litigant void-for-vagueness |
Whether California's vexatious litigant statute, in key provisions, utilizes the categorical approach, requiring guesswork and inviting arbitrary enfo… |
| 19-1047 |
Michael Weiss, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Jane L. Marsh, Deceased v. Damon Marsh, as Executor of the Estate of Monroe F. Marsh, Deceased, et al. |
California |
2020-02-24 |
Denied |
|
and whether California's vexatious litigant statu appellate-opinions bill-of-rights civil-procedure constitutional-challenge court-procedure due-process first-amendment full-faith-and-credit standing vexatious-litigant vexatious-litigant-statutes void-court-opinions void-grant-deed |
(1) Whether Full Faith and Credit can be given to the appellate opinion in G058123 and other of its specified opinions; (2) Do Code of Civ.Proc. 391.7… |
| 19-7425 |
Wylmina Louemna Hettinga v. Arcadia Management Services Co. |
California |
2020-01-27 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
access-to-courts civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection insurmountable-security legal-remedy security-deposit standing takings vexatious-litigant |
Is the imposition of insurmountable security on a California Vexatious Litigant a violation of the Equal Protection or Due Process rights?
Is the imp… |
| 19-713 |
Paul E. Nunu v. Nancy Nunu Risk, et al. |
Texas |
2019-12-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
abridged Petitioner's First-Amendment-right-to-pe as applied access-to-courts citizens-united-v-fec contempt court-access first-amendment petition-clause prior-restraint pro-se vexatious-litigant |
1. Whether the Texas Vexatious Litigant Statutes, as applied, abridged Petitioner's First Amendment unfettered core right to petition and to access Te… |
| 19-6736 |
Ralph Colombo v. Kinkle, Rodiger & Spriggs, et al. |
California |
2019-11-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
arbitrary-enforcement california-law categorical-approach civil-procedure due-process legal-enforcement statutory-interpretation vexatious-litigant void-for-vagueness |
Whether California's vexatious litigant statute, in key provisions, utilizes the categorical approach, requiring guesswork and inviting arbitrary enfo… |
| 19-6596 |
Wylmina Hettinga v. Timothy P. Loumena |
California |
2019-11-13 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
administrative-sanction civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process passport passport-suspension standing state-court-jurisdiction state-courts suspension vexatious-litigant |
Can the state courts levy Petitioner's joint bank accounts, freeze her safety deposit box, suspend her California clear teaching credential, and suspe… |
| 19-6574 |
Marco Gonzalez v. Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. |
California |
2019-11-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights conflicting-rulings constitutional-rights due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment legal-procedure res-judicata standing vexatious-litigant |
1) Why doesn't there exist Vexatious Litigant laws or procedure that addresses Multiplicity of California's §391 Motion with Conflicting Rulings based… |
| 19-542 |
Robert L. Jarrett, Jr. v. State Bar of California |
California |
2019-10-25 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-jurisdiction attorney-misconduct civil-procedure due-process judicial-precedent jurisdiction legislative-intent precedent recusal-standards standing supreme-court-review vexatious-litigant |
QUESTION NUMBER ONE
How does this Court resolve the absence of appellate
jurisdiction in the proceedings in which the attorney
misconduct is alleged… |
| 19-469 |
John Hsu v. City of Berkeley, California |
California |
2019-10-10 |
Denied |
|
arbitrary-enforcement california-law categorical-approach civil-procedure civil-rights due-process legal-enforcement standing statutory-interpretation vagueness vexatious-litigant void-for-vagueness |
Whether California's vexatious litigant statute, in key provisions, utilizes the categorical approach, requiring guesswork and inviting arbitrary enfo… |
| 19-443 |
Charles G. Kinney v. Philip S. Gutierrez, Judge, United States District Court for the Central District of California |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-10-03 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
access-to-courts bivens bivens-claim cruel-and-unusual-punishment cruel-unusual-punishment due-process eighth-amendment excessive-fines obstruction-of-justice vexatious-litigant |
A Bivens case allows a private individual to seek damages from an individual federal officer for unconstitutional conduct (e.g. 8th Amendment). Ziglar… |
| 19-5584 |
Christopher Isaac Simmons v. Grissom, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-08-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-waiver due-process in-forma-pauperis judicial-procedure prisoner-rights standing vexatious-litigant |
Did the Ninth Circuit impermissibly revoke Appellant's In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Status under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) where Heat Risk prisoner clearly made al… |
| 18-1472 |
In Re Christopher Hadsell |
|
2019-05-24 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
access-to-courts civil-procedure due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment judicial-bias judicial-jurisdiction judicial-misconduct jurisdiction mandamus standing unauthorized-practice-law unauthorized-practice-of-law vexatious-litigant vexatious-litigant-statutes |
In contrast to appellate-jurisdiction cases normally presented to this Court, the courts below provided no trial, and permitted no appellate review. T… |
| 18-8966 |
Eric Drake, aka E. V. Drake v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-04-23 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights court-access due-process equal-protection free-speech pro-se-litigation standing vexatious-litigant |
Petitioner is a citizen of the United States of America. Pursuant to the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, he has rights to bring lawsuits, de… |
| 18-8554 |
Wylmina Hettinga v. Timothy P. Loumena |
California |
2019-03-26 |
Denied |
IFP |
child-support civil-procedure court-jurisdiction due-process jurisdiction legal-standing parental-rights standing vexatious-litigant |
Can Petitioner be brought into a state superior court to be ordered to pay child support for a minor she had no legal rights to and no visitation righ… |
| 18-1184 |
Charles Kinney v. Michele R. Clark |
California |
2019-03-13 |
Denied |
|
11-usc-524 bankruptcy-law bankruptcy-law-violation chapter-7 civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-violation constitutional-rights discharge-of-debt discharged-debt due-process judicial-misconduct personal-liability unconstitutional-vagueness vexatious-litigant vexatious-litigant-law |
State court judges and justices continue to ignore bankruptcy law [11 U.S.C. Sec. 524(a)(1)] which "voids" any order by any court that implies that a … |
| 18-8270 |
Wylmina Hettinga v. Timothy P. Loumena |
California |
2019-03-05 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process liberty-interest minor-child monetary-judgment parental-visitation standing vexatious-litigant |
Does a vexatious litigant right have a reasonable opportunity to know the claims of the opposing party, who the opposing party is, and to rectify a mo… |
| 18-1138 |
Charles Kinney v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al. |
California |
2019-03-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
bankruptcy bankruptcy-law civil-rights constitutional-vagueness due-process first-amendment judicial-bias judicial-discretion retaliation standing vexatious-litigant |
Cal. vexatious litigant law is unconstitutionally vague on its face. The language is unclear as to: (a) what is "litigation"; (b) what has or doesn't … |
| 18-8105 |
Alicja Herriott v. Paul Herriott |
California |
2019-02-22 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
access-to-court access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-overbreadth discrimination due-process first-amendment first-amendment-right-to-petition overbreadth petition-rights privileges-immunities standing vexatious-litigant vexatious-litigant-statute |
In Be & K Constr. Co. v. NLRB (2002) 536 U.S. 516, 53, this Court held, that "The First Amendment provides, in relevant part, that "Congress shall mak… |
| 18-1096 |
Charles G. Kinney v. Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-02-22 |
Denied |
|
as-applied-challenge civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process facial-challenge first-amendment free-speech judicial-discretion pro-se-litigation retaliation standing vexatious-litigant |
Calif. vexatious litigant law is unconstitutionally vague on its face. The language is unclear as to: (a) what is "litigation"; (b) what has or doesn'… |
| 18-906 |
Charles G. Kinney v. Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-01-14 |
Denied |
|
abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech judicial-discretion separation-of-powers standing vexatious-litigant |
The vexatious litigant ("VL") laws are being used by state and federal courts to "punish" Kinney. Similar types of punishment have been imposed on lis… |
| 18-907 |
Charles G. Kinney v. Three Arch Bay Community Services District, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-01-14 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights clean-water-act due-process first-amendment free-speech judicial-discretion property-rights separation-of-powers standing vexatious-litigant |
Vexatious litigant ("VL") laws are being used by the courts to "punish" Kinney to the detriment of the environment. Punishment occurs even though Kinn… |
| 18-908 |
Charles G. Kinney v. Frances Rothschild, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-01-14 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
ada-violations civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-courts first-amendment free-speech judicial-misconduct separation-of-powers standing takings vexatious-litigant whistleblower |
The vexatious litigant ("VL") laws are being used by state and federal courts to "punish" Kinney. Similar types of punishment have been imposed on lis… |
| 18-7369 |
Rash B. Ghosh v. City of Berkeley, California, et al. |
California |
2019-01-10 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appeals appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights court-of-appeal due-process judicial-petition judicial-review procedural-safeguards property-rights standing vexatious-litigant |
The question presented is, does due process affirmatively require the State to provide meaningful procedural safeguards when it responds to judicial p… |
| 18-6813 |
Rash B. Ghosh v. City of Berkeley, California |
California |
2018-11-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure due-process final-determination judicial-review legal-argument relitigation standing vexatious-litigant |
was petitioner deprived of due process of law when the appellate court based its decision on an argument that had never been raised in the trial court… |
| 18-517 |
Charles G. Kinney v. Philip Gutierrez |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-10-19 |
Denied |
|
abuse-of-discretion bankruptcy-law civil-rights due-process free-speech judicial-discretion professional-speech section-1983 vexatious-litigant |
By simultaneously dismissing 8 of Kinney's pending appeals, did this 3 Judge panel abuse its discretion to cover-up acts by federal Judge Gutierrez wh… |
| 18-516 |
Charles G. Kinney v. Philip Gutierrez, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-10-19 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
bankruptcy bankruptcy-law civil-rights due-process federal-procedure free-speech judicial-discretion professional-speech retaliation section-1983 vexatious-litigant |
By simultaneously dismissing 8 of Kinney's pending appeals, did this 3 Judge panel abuse its discretion to cover-up acts by Justice Gutierrez and othe… |
| 18-510 |
Charles G. Kinney v. Michele R. Clark, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-10-18 |
Denied |
|
bankruptcy bankruptcy-law civil-rights due-process federal-law free-speech hobbs-act judicial-discretion professional-speech state-court-proceedings vexatious-litigant |
By simultaneously dismissing 8 of Kinney's pending appeals, did this 3 Judge panel abuse its discretion to cover-up acts by Justice Gutierrez, debtor … |
| 18-509 |
Charles G. Kinney v. State Bar of California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-10-18 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
anti-trust civil-rights civil-rights-violations color-of-authority due-process first-amendment free-speech interstate-commerce judicial-discretion judicial-misconduct professional-speech standing state-bar-regulation vexatious-litigant |
By simultaneously dismissing 8 of Kinney's pending appeals, did these same 3 Judges on a Ninth Circuit panel abuse their discretion by covering-up act… |
| 18-504 |
Charles G. Kinney v. Roger W. Boren, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-10-18 |
Denied |
|
appellate-procedure civil-rights due-process first-amendment Hobbs-Act Janus judicial-misconduct NIFLA professional-speech section-1983 vexatious-litigant |
By simultaneously dismissing 8 of Kinney's pending appeals, did this 3 Judge Ninth Circuit panel abuse its discretion to cover-up acts by Justice Roge… |
| 18-497 |
Jean Coulter v. Cathy Bissoon, Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2018-10-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-procedure civil-rights court-procedure due-process judicial-ethics judicial-misconduct recusal rule-of-law separation-of-powers vexatious-litigant |
Have the Courts' refusal to recuse and noncompliance with criminal/civil statutes, Case Law and their Code of Conduct and the Rule of Law - resulted i… |
| 18-424 |
Judith M. Brown-Williams, et vir v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al. |
California |
2018-10-03 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights consumer-warranty court-sanctions due-process excusable-neglect fraud rico standing vexatious-litigant vexatious-litigation warranty |
Did the Petitioner prevail in the Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act violation of (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1790 et seq.)
Did Respondent file … |
| 18-279 |
Frank Konarski, dba FGPJ Apartments and Development, et al. v. City of Tucson, Arizona, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-09-05 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights commerce-clause competitive-restraint due-process fair-housing-act interstate-commerce municipal-action rental-transactions restraint-of-trade standing takings vexatious-litigant |
Whether housing rental businesses are a part of the federally protected domain of interstate commerce.
If such business are per se a part of the fede… |