1. Did the Third Circuit err in not doing a De Nova Review of the Federal District Court Dismissal Order when the dismissal was pertaining to 28 USC 28 USC § 1915 (e)(2) (B) (iii)?

2. Did the Third Circuit err in blindly confirming the District Court Screening Procedures pursuant to 28 USC 28 USC £ 1915 (e)(2) (B) when the issue was pertaining to Judicial Immunity of Judges?

3. Did the Third Circuit err in sightlessly confirming the District Court Dismissal Order when it merely stated "relief sousht by Shaikh in the district Court does not concern actions by the defendants taken outside of their judicial capacity " without any analysis or speaking order or doing a De Nova Review of any of the factual violations of Defendants detailed in the Petitioners complaint?

4. Did the Third Circuit err in thoughtlessly confirming without any analysis or through a speaking order when it interpreted Mireles V. Waco 502 U.S.9 ( 1991) and merely stated "In Mireles. the Supreme Court held that iudses do not have immunity for" noniudicial actions" or "actions taken in complete absence of all jurisdiction ". We agree with the District Court that neither exception applies here and that the defendants were entitled to judicial immunity "?

5. Did the Third Circuit intentionally fail in conveniently not soeakins or deciding upon the Appellants following specific statements of issues under Appeal such as:
(1) Is it a violation of the Fist Amendment right of speech ( right to petition), 42USC 1981 (right to sue, vie evidence, to be parties to suits), the 14th Amendment right (due process) and access to the courts, even if the person has been determined vexatious by a State Court, in particularly as in this case.
(a) US Citizens are determined as vexatious by fraud and conspiracy
(b) If US citizen 's civil cases are not being evaluated properly and thus his or her access to courts are wrongfully denied, restricting their ability to sue
(c) If appellate courts have refused to accept US Citizens petitions because he or she has been wrongfully determined as a vexatious litigant
(2) Whether the vexatious litigant statutes should be outlawed as unconstitutional, offensive to due process, and fair play, and or a tool that is used by defense attorneys and judges to abuse non-lawyers, violate their rights and win cases for the defense ?

6. Did the Third Circuit deceptively take the shield of Judicial Immunity in order to illegally save the errant Judicial Defendants from a rishtful Pro Se litisant when it conveniently failed to speak or decide upon the Appellants following specific statement of issues under Appeal such as:
(1) Whether the NJ Federal District Court manifestly failed to notice and. consider the Defendant Judge Frances Hodgson denied the FEE WAIVER order, after granting the same earlier in the day and to legally construe itas an ADMINISTRATIVE ACT, which caused Plaintiff 's home to be lost to Sheriff sale/foreclosure on Sep 19. 2019.
(2) Whether the NJ Federal District Court, miserably failed to notice and consider that all [C

Did the Third Circuit err in not doing a De Nova Review