No. 19-7425
Wylmina Louemna Hettinga v. Arcadia Management Services Co.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection insurmountable-security legal-remedy security-deposit standing takings vexatious-litigant
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is the imposition of insurmountable security on a California Vexatious Litigant a violation of the Equal Protection or Due Process rights?
Is the imposition of an insurmountable security closely tailored to advance California's interests in ensuring the orderly resolutions of disputes?
Is the imposition of an insurmountable security vague and a violation of the Equal Protection or Due Process rights?
Is the imposition of an insurmountable security a "unique kind of deprivation" violating the Equal Protection or Due Process rights?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the imposition of insurmountable security on a California Vexatious Litigant a violation of the Equal Protection or Due Process rights?
Docket Entries
2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-20
Petitioner complied with order of March 30, 2020.
2020-03-30
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until April 20, 2020, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2020-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2019-11-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 26, 2020)
Attorneys
Wylmina Louemna Hettinga
Wylmina Hettinga — Petitioner