| 23-6362 |
Gregory Steshenko v. Foothill-De Anza Community College District, et al. |
California |
2023-12-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
backpropagation-doctrine civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-access due-process finality interlocutory-appeals standing vexatious-litigant |
Whether the interlocutory decisions of the federal courts - especially, those appealed under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 - ever become the final determinations?
… |
| 21-6317 |
Clayton G. Walker v. Steve Barnett, South Dakota Secretary of State, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-11-17 |
Denied |
IFP |
amendment-interpretation candidate-rights constitutional-access election election-rights equal-protection judicial-procedure jurisdiction mask-mandate writ-of-mandamus |
1. Should everyone have the same Access During the Pandemic.
2. Should Walker as a Candidate for United States Sente be grated the same rights as oth… |
| 21-305 |
Angela DeBose v. University of South Florida Board of Trustees |
Florida |
2021-08-31 |
Denied |
|
agency-records constitutional-access exemptions fee-waiver foia foia-exemptions freedom-of-information privileges-and-immunities public-information public-records |
1. Whether the agency records at issue in this case are exempt from disclosure under any of the nine exemptions under the FOIA.
2. Whether non-exempt… |
| 20-7999 |
David James Lola v. Miami Herald, Inc., et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-05-12 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts appellate-rights civil-procedure constitutional-access court-procedure dismissal in-forma-pauperis judicial-review national-emergency post-conviction-relief procedural-default reconsideration |
Does due process dictate that in a
Pro Se appeal to a final action
should a clerk's entry of dismissal
for failure to prosecute be set aside
and an ap… |
| 19-1237 |
LeRoy K. Wheeler v. North Dakota, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-04-21 |
Denied |
|
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-access court-access due-process judicial-bias judicial-review legal-prejudice meritorious-claims prisoner-rights pro-se pro-se-prisoner |
Do poor pro-se prisoners have a constitutional right to access the courts and to justice that will compel courts to rule on the merits of valid consti… |
| 19-874 |
William Alan Pesnell, et al. v. Jill Sessions, et al. |
Louisiana |
2020-01-15 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
constitutional-access criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment first-amendment fourteenth-amendment fundamental-rights public-access public-records sixth-amendment trial-recording |
1. Whether La. R.S. 44:4(47) and the local rule of the 26th Judicial District Court in and for Bossier Parish can bar public access to the digital rec… |
| 18-8930 |
Amy Rebecca Gurvey v. Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., et al. |
Second Circuit |
2019-04-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
28-usc-1295 28-usc-1338 attorney-misconduct conflicts-of-law constitutional-access federal-circuit patent-appeal-jurisdiction patent-appeals patent-conflicts-of-interest patent-damages patent-infringement patent-jurisdiction patent-statutes pro-se-litigation |
Whether the Second Circuit was void of jurisdiction to adjudicate the instant appeal and improperly defied US patent statutes and Federal Circuit law … |
| 18-8841 |
Frizzell Carrell Woodson v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-04-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-access due-process due-process-clause employment-discrimination federal-employment-discrimination in-forma-pauperis pro-se-plaintiff property-right retaliation title-vii-litigation |
Whether or not the Due Process Clause also includes a substantive component that provides heightened protection for a property right of action vested … |
| 18-8326 |
Dana Gray v. V. Romero, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-03-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
7th-amendment access-to-court civil-rights constitutional-access due-process expert-testimony medical-care medical-care-claims medical-expert neutral-expert prisoner-rights pro-se-litigation summary-judgment |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS NEED TO RELIABLY APPOINT NEUTRAL MEDICAL EXPERTS IN INDIVIDUAL PRISONER PRO SE §42 USC 1983 MEDICAL CARE CASES WITH COGN… |