| 19-8497 |
Christopher Lyman v. Kansas |
Kansas |
2020-05-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
confrontation-clause criminal-defendant due-process expert-testimony first-amendment fourteenth-amendment medical-expert religious-discrimination sixth-amendment |
Whether a court can deny a criminal defendant his medical expert, who's expert testimony is critical to a material fact in dispute, and base this deni… |
| 18-9455 |
Scott William Dummert v. Renee Ngo |
Nevada |
2019-05-29 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process expert-affidavit financial-hardship medical-expert medical-malpractice reasons-for-granting standing statement-of-case statutory-provisions |
Motion to Sequester due to Financial Hardship Expert Medical Affidavit |
| 18-8587 |
In Re Christopher Stegawski |
|
2019-03-27 |
Denied |
IFP |
21-cfr-1306.04 21-usc-802 21-usc-841 allocution chronic-pain-treatment cross-examination due-process fair-trial ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel medical-expert strickland-standard strickland-v-washington trial-fairness united-states-v-moore witness-testimony |
Was the trial fair when:
- prosecution took 5 days of testimonies and defense none
- key defense witnesses were not investigated pretrial
- court deni… |
| 18-8326 |
Dana Gray v. V. Romero, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-03-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
7th-amendment access-to-court civil-rights constitutional-access due-process expert-testimony medical-care medical-care-claims medical-expert neutral-expert prisoner-rights pro-se-litigation summary-judgment |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS NEED TO RELIABLY APPOINT NEUTRAL MEDICAL EXPERTS IN INDIVIDUAL PRISONER PRO SE §42 USC 1983 MEDICAL CARE CASES WITH COGN… |
| 18-5199 |
Keith Warren Lewis v. Rachelle Hadari |
New Jersey |
2018-07-11 |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment civil-rights court-procedure custody custody-evaluation due-process fair-trial family-law medical-expert mental-health partisan-expert trial-fairness |
Whether in custody cases a court can force one party to be evaluated by the opposing party's private medical expert. Is this an unconstitutional abuse… |