No. 18-6813
Rash B. Ghosh v. City of Berkeley, California
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure due-process final-determination judicial-review legal-argument relitigation standing vexatious-litigant
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
was petitioner deprived of due process of law when the appellate court based its decision on an argument that had never been raised in the trial court?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was petitioner deprived of due process of law when the appellate court based its decision on an argument that had never been raised in the trial court?
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-01-25
Petitioner complied with order of January 7, 2019.
2019-01-07
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until January 28, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2018-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-28
Waiver of right of respondent City of Berkeley, CA to respond filed.
2018-11-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 26, 2018)
Attorneys
City of Berkeley, CA
Farimah Faiz Brown — City Attorney's Office, Respondent
Rash B. Ghosh
Rash B. Ghosh — Petitioner