1. Whether the Federal Circuit's Order is not void for vagueness. What is a "vexatious" litigant? Not defined and therefore has not been proven.

2. Whether the word "vexatious" was deemed to lack due process insertion of fair warning.

3. Whether the word "vexatious" "is unconstitutionally vague because it subjects the exercise of the right to a neutral judge to an unascertainable standard, and unconstitutionally broad because it authorizes the punishment of constitutionally protected conduct.

4. Whether the Federal Circuit's and the District Court's arbitrary Order of "vexatious litigant,' never before been defined nor proven, is unco

Whether the Federal Circuit's use of the term 'vexatious litigant' violates due process by failing to provide fair notice and constituting an unconstitutionally vague standard