Whether housing rental businesses are a part of the federally protected domain of interstate commerce.

If such business are per se a part of the federal domain, whether municipal actors, like Respondents—merely because they are local actors—are totally free from federal law to engage in the non-state-sanctioned conduct of restraining housing rental competition by pursuing a self-designated unilateral municipal action that, by design, causes the losses of housing rental transactions of some of such businesses, like Petitioners', in order to have tenants from there move/funneled to other such businesses that are favored, thus enabling the latter businesses, through no action of their own but that of the municipal actors, to have a competitive advantage over the former businesses.

Whether a court's replacement of the content of a moving party's motion for an extreme sanction obligates the court to first provide the alleged offending party, who is subject to the extreme sanction, notice and opportunity to address such content replacement as part of due process before the actual issuance of the extreme sanction.

Whether housing rental businesses are part of the federally protected domain of interstate commerce