No. 23-6606
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: article-iii civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-interpretation jurisdictional-issue juvenile-justice legal-standards sentencing statutory-construction statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2025-01-10
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
I.HOW DOES-ONE NOT HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL
SAME FREEDOMS AS A JUVENILE WHOSE STANDARDS
-ULTS ARE LESS IN THIS GREAT COUNTRY?RIGHT TO THE
FOR ADII.WHEN AN ARTICLE III. SUBSECTION 3.5
BY 28 U.S.C. SUBSECTION 1651 FOR
-IONER ,THE JUDICIARY SHALL ESTABLISH
THE LAW IN THE CONSTITUTIONALITY?ISSUE IS RAISED
THE INDIVIDUAL PETIT-
THE SPIRIT OF
III.HOW SHALL THE FULL PURPOSES
-OBJECTIVES ,IF THE LAW IS NOT FOLLOWED?OF CONGRESS REACH THIER
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Docket Entries
2025-01-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-12-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-04-19
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2024.
2023-10-11
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2024)
Attorneys
Jose Jimenez
Jose Alonso Jimenez — Petitioner