No. 19-6737

Leonard L. Little, Jr. v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2019-11-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment appellate-review carpenter-v-united-states constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process evidence federal-law fourth-amendment-search-and-seizure jurisdiction legal-standards privacy search-and-seizure sixth-amendment-confrontation-clause standing supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference: 2020-01-24
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. Petitioner asks did the Second District Court of Appeal apply federal law issued by the
United States Supreme Court in a way that frustrates and undermines its holdings set forth in
Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206. 201L. Ed. 2d 5071

II. Petitioner asks did the Second District Court of Appeal apply federal law issued by the
United States Supreme Court in a way that frustrates and undermines its holdings set forth in
Padilla v. State, 189 So. 3d 986 (Fla. 2nd DCA2016) and Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36.
61, 124 S. Ct. 1354, 158 L. Ed. 2d 177 (2004;?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Second District Court of Appeal apply federal law issued by the United States Supreme Court in a way that frustrates and undermines its holdings set forth in Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206, 201 L. Ed. 2d 507?

Docket Entries

2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-12-23
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2019-10-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 23, 2019)

Attorneys

Florida
Carla Suzanne BechardOffice of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondent
Leonard Little
Leonard Little Jr. — Petitioner