No. 18-9384

In Re Freya Pearson

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-05-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-counsel legal-standards mandamus pro-se standing takings writ-of-relief
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the Petitioner's Direct Appeal, warrants the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to compel action by the Court.

2. Whether the Petitioner should be released immediately on Bond

3. Whether the Petitioner is entitled to Counsel, and whether the Courts repeated denial of Counsel violated her rights.

4. Whether 18 U.S.C 1957 is void for vagueness, and/or whether its misuse is Un-Constitutional

5. Whether the Prosecutors participation in the use of False testimony warrants dismissal of Petitioners Indictment

6. Whether or not the District Court has Jurisdiction when the Prosecutor manufactures probable cause, manipulates the Grand Jury into issuing an indictment not resting on truth, and participates in the presentation of False/Fabricated testimony designed to produce a "Tainted Indictment".

7. Whether the Petitioner's Attorney was deficient by not requiring the Court to address the "Materiality" element of 18 U.S.C 1001.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner was denied due process and equal protection under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments when the district court dismissed her habeas corpus petition without a hearing

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-25
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2019)

Attorneys

In Re Freya Pearson
Freya Pearson — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent