No. 19-924
Tags: 7th-circuit court-interpretation custodial-interrogation interview-context miranda-rights miranda-v-arizona police-station security-features station-layout
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure Securities
CriminalProcedure Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-06-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
When analyzing whether a station-house interview is a custodial interrogation under Miranda, do the ordinary security features and layout of a police station weigh in favor of a determination that the interview was "custodial"?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When analyzing whether a station-house interview is a custodial interrogation under Miranda, do the ordinary security features and layout of a police station weigh in favor of a determination that the interview was 'custodial'?
Docket Entries
2020-06-22
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-06-01
Reply of petitioner State of Indiana filed. (Distributed)
2020-05-18
Brief of respondent Ernesto Ruiz in opposition filed.
2020-03-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 18, 2020.
2020-03-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 16, 2020 to May 18, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-03-17
Response Requested. (Due April 16, 2020)
2020-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-02-24
Waiver of right of respondent Ernesto Ruiz to respond filed.
2020-01-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 24, 2020)
2019-11-15
Application (19A531) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until January 20, 2020.
2019-11-08
Application (19A531) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 21, 2019 to January 20, 2020, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Ernesto Ruiz
Shay Dvoretzky — Jones Day, Respondent
Mark E. Kamish — Baldwin Perry & Kamish, P.C., Respondent
State of Indiana
Thomas M. Fisher — Petitioner