No. 19-8812
Alfonso Pineda-Hernandez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-question constitutional-rights court-interpretation criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process fair-trial interpretation translation translation-rights
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Under what circumstances does a live, in-court translation violate a criminal defendant's due process rights?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Under what circumstances does a live, in-court translation violate a criminal defendant's due process rights?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Alfonso Pineda-Hernandez
Kyle Russell Hosmer — Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent