.Did the Supreme Court of California (S281800)deniai of petition of review
on Sept 27 23 ieft an existence of an unresolved conflict legal issue) in
disqualification matter of judge hillman and a matter of public importance?( see Exhibit
A with Writ Certiorari)

.Did the 5th District Court denial (F086624)of petition of mandamus on Aug
31st 23 left an existence of a confiictf legal issue in disqualification matter of judge
hillman and a matter of public importance?( see Exhibit A with Writ certiorari)

.Did Judge Hillman's decision to "order strike Motion of disqualification"
dated July 18th 23 was erroneous and abuse of discretion?( see Exhibit A with Writ Certiorari)

.Did Judge Hillman's decision to not recuse himself from this case was
erroneous and abuse of discretion?

.Was Judge Hilimari Aug 22 23 rulings made in this case while writ
mandamus on disqualification pending(F086624) considered void ?(Exhibit I
pg 4,18-34 of S281800)

.Was Judge Hillman Judicial misconduct a matter of public concern ?

.Did Judge Hillman's is identified as a witness and co conspirator with the
defendant in the complaint VCu29830Q ?

.Will Presiding of Partial or Appeared bias Judge Hillman in this case lead to
serious risk of misjustice, loss of public trust in a judicial process?

.Did Petitioner present sufficient facts and evidence that raised questions on
Judge Hillman credibility and competence to preside over Petitioner case
and/or other Tulare Superior Court Cases?

. Does Judge Brett Hillman is ethically, legally and morally fit or competent to be an unbiased
judge in plaintiff cases or as a matter of fact in other cases?

Did the Supreme Court of California deny petition of review, leaving an unresolved conflict and matter of public importance?