No. 21-323
Oklahoma v. Michael Eugene Spears
Tags: 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled criminal-appellate-review criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights native-american-sovereignty oklahoma-criminal-law oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma should be overruled
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-10
Reply of petitioner Oklahoma filed.
2021-11-01
Brief of respondent Michael E. Spears in opposition filed.
2021-11-01
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Michael E. Spears.
2021-10-28
Brief amicus curiae of Cherokee Nation filed.
2021-10-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 1, 2021.
2021-09-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 1, 2021 to November 1, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-09-22
Letter from counsel for petitioner filed.
2021-08-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 1, 2021)
Attorneys
Cherokee Nation
Chrissi Ross Nimmo — Cherokee Nation, Amicus
Michael E. Spears
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner