No. 25-587
Julio Licinio v. New York, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: burden-shifting case-law employment-discrimination judicial-framework mcdonnell-douglas stare-decisis
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2026-01-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), should be overruled.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green should be overruled
Docket Entries
2026-01-12
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-11
Waiver of right of respondent New York, et al. to respond filed.
2025-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 18, 2025)
2025-09-10
Application (25A271) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until November 14, 2025.
2025-09-04
Application (25A271) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 15, 2025 to November 14, 2025, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Julio Licinio
Glenn Evans Roper — Pacific Legal Foundation, Petitioner
New York, et al.
Barbara Dale Underwood — New York Solicitor General, Respondent