No. 19-6594

David Ingraham v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2019-11-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: violate the principals of due-process constitutional-fairness due-process eight-amendment eighth-amendment judicial-integrity juvenile-offenders parole stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

(1). Does the decision of the Florida Supreme Court in overturning its previous
decision deciding a Federal Constitutional question, violate the principals of due
process and judicial integrity where it is obvious that said decision in based upon
nothing more than a change in membership of the court and the belief that the
previous decision was wrongly decided?

(2). Does the decision of this Court in Virginia v. LeBlanc, 37 S.Ct. 1726 (2017),'
clarify that the Florida Supreme Court misapplied United States Supreme Court
precedent in previously concluding Florida 's parole system, as applied to juvenile
offenders, violated the Eight Amendment. ?

(3) Does the Florida Supreme Court 's reliance upon this Court 's holding in LeBlanc
permit the court to properly reconsider and settle, in accords with constitutional
fairness and the principles of Stare Decisis, the issue of whether Florida 's parole
system violates petitioner 's Eight Amendment right?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the decision of the Florida Supreme Court in overturning its previous decision violate due-process,judicial-integrity

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-01-22
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-09-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 13, 2019)

Attorneys

David Ingraham
David Ingraham — Petitioner