No. 18-6099
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2255 due-process judicial-administration judicial-integrity judicial-process stare-decisis supervisory-authority
Latest Conference:
2018-10-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
When the courts below violate due process by denying a meaningful opportunity to be heard in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding, will the United States Supreme Court act in its supervisory authority to ensure proper judicial administration and restore integrity of the judicial process?
Is Stare Decisis a doctrine of convenience?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When the courts below violate due process by denying a meaningful opportunity to be heard in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding, will the United States Supreme Court act in its supervisory authority to ensure proper judicial administration and restore integrity of the judicial process?
Docket Entries
2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-10-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-09-05
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 25, 2018)
Attorneys
Terry Margheim
Terry Margheim — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent