1. Whether the Fifth Circuits ruling conflicts with this Court's ruling on case law and Summary Judgement, F.R.C.P. 56(a).

2. Whether a District Court can settle a disputed fact as to who rented or owned the Motorized Wheel chair/Scooter and then grant summary judgement to the moving party, based solely on the grounds that the plaintiff only has conclusional allegations, unsupported assertions, and presented only a scintilla of evidence, while the movant, ironically, only listed conclusory allegations, unsupported assertions and presented only a scintilla of evidence and proffered nothing.

3. Whether in summary judgement, does listing five (5) exhibits without arguments, without witnesses with first-hand knowledge, and without statements from other witnesses be considered evidentiary evidence, or would they only become evidentiary evidence when combined with arguments, witnesses with first-hand knowledge, or statements from other witnesses?

Whether the Fifth Circuit's ruling conflicts with Supreme Court precedent on summary judgment standards under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a)