| 25-6286 |
Wilfredo Feliciano-Rodriguez v. United States |
First Circuit |
2025-12-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure federal-statute habeas-corpus judicial-discretion statutory-interpretation time-limit |
Is the Appellate Court able to violate 28 U.S.C. §2244(b)(3)(D) arguing that this statute is not mandatory but a simple guideline?
It is incontrovert… |
| 25A587 |
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Robert F. Kennedy, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2025-11-18 |
Application |
|
certiorari consumer-protection extension pharmaceutical regulatory time-limit |
Question not identified. |
| 25A380 |
William Scott v. Howard Hanna |
Third Circuit |
2025-10-02 |
Presumed Complete |
|
appellate-jurisdiction federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure jurisdictional-defect mandatory-deadline notice-of-appeal time-limit |
Question not identified. |
| 24-783 |
Enbridge Energy, LP, et al. v. Dana Nessel, Attorney General of Michigan, on Behalf of the People of the State of Michigan |
Sixth Circuit |
2025-01-23 |
Granted |
Amici (13)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (6) |
district-court federal-jurisdiction procedural-rule removal statutory-interpretation time-limit |
Whether district courts have the authority to excuse the thirty-day procedural time limit for removal in 28 U.S.C. § 1446 (b)(1). |
| 24-730 |
Robert H. Gravatt, III v. Montgomery County, Maryland, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-01-13 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-jurisdiction court-procedure federal-rules reconsideration-motion rule-4 time-limit |
Whether the 28-day limit to toll a postjudgment reconsideration motion of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4)(A) is jurisdictional. |
| 24A322 |
Charles D. Hood v. Donald J. Trump, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-10-02 |
Presumed Complete |
|
appellate-procedure district-court-judgment federal-jurisdiction jurisdictional-requirement notice-of-appeal time-limit |
Question not identified. |
| 23-7610 |
David K. Horsley v. Ohio |
Ohio |
2024-05-31 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
6th-amendment anders-review appellate-procedure constitutional-violation due-process procedural-safeguards right-to-counsel sixth-amendment stare-decisis time-limit |
Does Ohio's App. R. 26 (B)(1) violate the 6th Amendment of the United States Constitution by applying a time limit to when an applicant can file to re… |
| 23A691 |
Ryan Morrison v. Alvaro Ramos, in His Individual and Official Capacity, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-01-25 |
Presumed Complete |
|
certiorari court-of-appeals extension petition supreme-court time-limit |
Question not identified. |
| 23A581 |
Metal Conversion Technologies, LLC v. Department of Transportation |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-12-22 |
Denied |
|
administrative-procedure agency-adjudication appointments-clause equitable-tolling judicial-review time-limit |
Question not identified. |
| 21-7734 |
Bruce Mitchell Nicholson v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-04-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure criminal-procedure exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment probable-cause reasonableness search-warrant time-limit |
Does a violation of a time-limit prescribed in a search warrant render a search unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment? |
| 21-687 |
John Donnelly Sweeney, et al. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, et al. |
California |
2021-11-09 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-hearing agency-enforcement defendant-rights due-process enforcement-order fair-trial procedural-fairness prosecutorial-misconduct time-limit time-limitation |
John Sweeney personally repaired a low dirt levee surrounding a small island in a marsh. Two California agencies, after brief hearings, responded by i… |
| 20-1472 |
Boechler, P.C. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-04-21 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (6) |
claim-processing-rule equitable-tolling internal-revenue-code jurisdiction jurisdictional-requirement tax-court tax-law time-limit |
Whether the time limit in Section 6330(d)(1) is a jurisdictional requirement or a claim-processing rule subject to equitable tolling. |
| 20-169 |
Lawrence Richard Metsch v. Timothy Hajdasz |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-08-18 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-litigation civil-procedure diversity-jurisdiction federal-procedure removal removal-jurisdiction rule-11-sanctions sanctions stonewalling subject-matter-jurisdiction time-limit |
Did the Eleventh Circuit err when it affirmed the District Court's imposition of sanctions pursuant to Rule 11, for the removal by Petitioners Lawrenc… |
| 19-8068 |
Daniel B. Boudette v. Tammy Boudette, nka Tammy Oskerson |
Montana |
2020-03-23 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law enforceability foreign-judgment full-faith-and-credit judgment-enforcement originating-state sister-state-judgment state-law time-limit time-limitation |
1. Does a state's enforcement of a sister state's judgment beyond the time limit when it is enforceable in the originating state contravene the Full F… |
| 19-6505 |
Michael Ingram v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-11-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
21-usc-851 21-usc-851-enhancement 28-usc-2255 28-usc-2255-f-4 federal-law federal-procedure federal-sentencing geographic-disparities geographic-disparity habeas-corpus sentencing-commission sentencing-commission-report statute-of-limitations statutory-interpretation time-limit time-limitation |
Where the United States Sentencing Commission publishes a report summarizing the geographic disparities in the application of the 21 U.S.C. §851 enhan… |
| 19-5683 |
Isaiah Jermale Legall v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-08-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal appeal-deadline appeals appellate-procedure civil-procedure due-process equitable-tolling federal-rules federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure judicial-discretion standing time-limit |
1. Whether equitable tolling applies to the time limit to appeal set forth in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(1)(A). |
| 18-6147 |
Macking Nettles v. Connie Horton, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2018-10-01 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
aedpa due-process guilty-plea habeas-corpus mental-incompetence procedural-bar substantive-due-process time-limit |
I. Whether a procedural bar or the AEDPA time limit apply to the substantive due process mental incompetence issue that petitioner plead guilty while … |