No. 21-502
Oklahoma v. Terrance Lucas Cottingham
Tags: criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-sovereignty overruling-precedent stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452
(2020), should be overruled.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma should be overruled
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-18
Reply of petitioner Oklahoma filed.
2021-11-04
Brief of respondent Terrance L. Cottingham in opposition filed.
2021-11-04
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Terrance L. Cottingham.
2021-10-29
Brief amicus curiae of Cherokee Nation filed.
2021-10-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 4, 2021)
Attorneys
Cherokee Nation
Chrissi Ross Nimmo — Cherokee Nation, Amicus
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner
Terrance L. Cottingham
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent