| 24-6856 |
Curtis Hawthorne v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-03-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-issue judicial-review legal-jurisdiction pro-se-petition state-courts supreme-court-review |
1. As there are conflicting decisions amongst state courts of last resort concerning a constitutional issue, in accordance with Rule X, this matter is… |
| 24-945 |
Jenn-Ching Luo v. Owen J. Roberts School District, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2025-03-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-issue default-judgment federal-rules-civil-procedure judicial-procedure pre-answer-motion void-judgment |
Whether bombing courts or shooting judges is a holy mission to counter a corrupt judicial system? That is a satire to ridicule the Courts below if a c… |
| 24A764 |
Rocco Americo Malanga v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2025-02-06 |
Presumed Complete |
|
agency-rules constitutional-issue due-process loss-calculation pro-se sentencing-guidelines |
Question not identified. |
| 24-830 |
Jenn-Ching Luo v. Owen J. Roberts School District, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2025-02-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
article-1-section-10 constitutional-issue due-process procedural-rules summons-deadline void-judgment |
(1) Summons set forth that the defendant should respond to the summons "within 21 days after service of this summons." Under Article 1 Section 10 Clau… |
| 24-5223 |
Michael Domonic Sales v. Tennessee |
Tennessee |
2024-08-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure constitutional-issue court-record due-process judicial-review jurisdiction legal-petition related-cases standing supreme-court takings |
Question not identified. |
| 23-7426 |
Saye Henry Gofan, Jr. v. Cameron C. Gustafson, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2024-05-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-issue court-of-appeals district-court due-process free-speech habeas-corpus jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge legal-procedure standing |
Question not identified. |
| 23-5747 |
Daryl A. Hess v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2023-10-11 |
Denied |
IFP |
8th-amendment appellate-jurisdiction civil-rights constitutional-issue due-process evidentiary-hearing federal-review habeas-corpus judicial-procedure newly-discovered-evidence post-conviction |
Question not identified. |
| 22-7562 |
Joseph Tetak v. Jay Forshey, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-05-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review constitutional-interpretation constitutional-issue deference-standard federal-habeas-corpus habeas-corpus judicial-precedent stare-decisis state-supreme-court subjective-objective-analysis |
Does the doctrine of stare decisis prevail on a state supreme
court's determination of a constitutional issue in the same manner
as this Court's deter… |
| 22-5657 |
Dawud Wilson v. Leon Hill, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-09-22 |
Denied |
IFP |
and thus warrants Petitioner overcoming a state p appellate-analysis constitutional-issue constitutional-review federal-jurisdiction judicial-procedure merits-review plain-error plain-error-analysis state-appeals-court state-procedural-bar |
1. Whether the state appeals court's plain error analysis amounted to a review of the merits, and thus warrants Petitioner overcoming a state procedur… |
| 21-6516 |
Martin Robinson v. Sean Bailey |
Ohio |
2021-12-07 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeals certiorari civil-procedure constitutional-issue due-process judicial-review jurisdiction legal-procedure lower-court-decision meritorious-claims standing supreme-court-review |
DID PLAINT. BALEY FAIL TO SERVE DEFT. ROBINSON PER CIV.R?
WAS TE TRIAL DOCKET FALSIFIED?
WAS TRIAL HELD?
WAS ROBINSON ABLE TO GIVE ANSWER?
WAS ROB… |
| 21-5402 |
Ronald E. West v. United States |
District of Columbia |
2021-08-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-issue criminal-procedure due-process election-dispute election-procedure judicial-review legal-challenge recidivism rehabilitation sentencing supreme-court |
Question not identified. |
| 20-7494 |
Kirk A. Simmons v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2021-03-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure constitutional-issue fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court habeas-corpus jurisdiction legal-innocence rule-60 rule-60-motion standing |
1. Did the District Court abuse its discretion when it dismissed petitioner's
Rule 60 motion, which asserted evidence falsification and Fraud on the … |
| 19-8117 |
Vincent D. White, Jr. v. Donnie Morgan, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-03-27 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-2254 constitutional-issue due-process exhaustion-doctrine federal-constitutional-issue federal-habeas procedural-default state-courts state-prisoner statutory-interpretation |
In federal habeas cases, whether federal courts should exclusively apply 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b) when evaluating State assertions that a State prisoner ha… |
| 19-5910 |
Benjamin Carpenter v. Georgia |
Georgia |
2019-09-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights complicity constitutional-issue criminal-liability criminal-procedure due-process error-analysis indictment jury-instructions standing supreme-court-review unchorged-crime |
Can Criminal Liability for a charged offense be based upon the Defendant's complicity in an offense which is clearly distinct from any charged offense… |
| 18-9686 |
Bobby Bordelon v. Texas |
Texas |
2019-06-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-conflict constitutional-issue criminal-procedure double-jeopardy fifth-amendment habeas-corpus manifest-necessity mistrial mistrial-standard texas-courts |
There are three reasons petitioner contends that this Court should grant certiorari of this federal constitutional issue regarding whether the Fifth A… |
| 18-8339 |
Joshua E. Shepherd v. Jeffrey E. Krueger, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-03-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
acca-prior-conviction acca-purposes constitutional-interpretation constitutional-issue criminal-law due-process federal-court federal-court-jurisdiction federal-courts prior-conviction sentencing state-case-law state-courts state-statute state-statute-analysis statutory-interpretation |
Whether the Constitution permits a federal court to conclude that a prior conviction is "generic" for ACCA purposes based solely on another federal co… |
| 18-7755 |
Pauline Garcia v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs |
Federal Circuit |
2019-02-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
administrative-law administrative-regulation civil-procedure constitutional-issue constitutional-law due-process henderson-v-shinseki judicial-review procedural-rights standing veterans-affairs veterans-law |
When should a Veteran be allowed to raise a Constitutional Due Process issue under 38 C.F.R. § 20.1409?
Does the reasoning of Henderson v. Shinseki, … |
| 18-7616 |
Rodrigo Tovar Pupo v. United States |
District of Columbia |
2019-02-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal constitutional-issue constitutional-issues criminal-appeal criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-appeal district-court due-process guilty-plea ineffective-assistance-of-counsel offense-enhancement plea-bargaining sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines |
If Appeals Court erred by not considering the grounds raised by Appellant and denying his appeal disregarding the Constitutional issues raised by Appe… |
| 18-6559 |
Tommy Alexander, Sr. v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-11-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bias civil-procedure constitutional-issue constitutional-rights court-recusal due-process fair-and-impartial-court impartiality judicial-bias recusal tribunal-fairness |
The question before this Court is the recusal of the District Court in this Cause since the District Court has displayed a bias against the Petitioner… |
| 18-6085 |
Gerald Daniels v. Janet Dowling, Warden |
Tenth Circuit |
2018-09-24 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-issue constitutional-law constitutional-review equal-protection evasion federal-court federal-courts habeas-corpus race-discrimination state-court state-law state-law-interpretation |
1. WHETHER A FEDERAL HABEAS COURT MAY REEXAMINE A STATE COURT'S INTERPRETATION OF STATE LAW WHEN IT IS AN OBVIOUS SUBTERFUGE TO EVADE CONSIDERATION OF… |