Does the doctrine of stare decisis prevail on a state supreme
court's determination of a constitutional issue in the same manner
as this Court's determination of Supreme Law?

Does an intermediate state appellate court's decision govern the
deference standard of federal habeas corpus where it conflicts
with the primary judicial policymaker's decision on the same con
stitutional protection?

Is debatable a subjective or objective analysis?

Does the doctrine of stare decisis prevail on a state supreme court's determination of a constitutional issue in the same manner as this Court's determination of Supreme Law?