| 22-816 |
The School of the Ozarks, Inc., dba College of the Ozarks v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (10) |
administrative-law administrative-procedure-act article-iii-standing enforcement executive-order fair-housing-act gender-identity notice-and-comment regulatory-enforcement standing |
1. Whether a notice-and-comment violation, on its own, can establish Article III standing for a regulated entity within the applicable zone of interes… |
20.5 |
| 21-1431 |
Robert M. Kerr, Director, South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
GVR |
Amici (6)Relisted (3) |
circuit-split civil-rights due-process medicaid medicaid-act private-right-of-action privately-enforceable-rights section-1983 spending-clause standing statutory-interpretation |
1. Whether Spending Clause statutes ever give rise to privately enforceable rights under § 1983, and if so, what is the proper framework for deciding … |
17.5 |
| 22-636 |
S. S. v. United States, et al. |
Armed Forces |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
court-martial criminal-appeal evidentiary-review in-camera-review intervention-rights jaffee-v-redmond m.r.e.-513 military-evidence military-rule-of-evidence psychotherapist-patient-privilege psychotherapist-privilege upjohn-co-v-united-states |
1. Whether diagnoses and treatments are
privileged under the military's
psychotherapist-patient privilege; and
2. Whether a privilege holder has the … |
16.5 |
| 22-534 |
Theresa Eagleson, Director, Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services v. St. Anthony Hospital, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
GVR |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
42-usc-1983 contract-enforcement managed-care medicaid private-rights section-1983 spending-clause statutory-duty timely-payment |
1. Whether Spending Clause legislation, including Section u-2(f), can impliedly create private rights enforceable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
2. Whether,… |
15.5 |
| 22-887 |
Rogelio Albino Diaz-Tomas v. North Carolina |
North Carolina |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process indefinite-postponement north-carolina plea-bargaining prosecution-postponement speedy-trial |
In Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213 (1967), the Court held unconstitutional a practice unique to North Carolina, under which the state indefini… |
15.0 |
| 22-815 |
Victor B. Skaar v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (4) |
administrative-law all-writs-act class-action exhaustion exhaustion-requirement federal-circuit injunctive-relief judicial-jurisdiction statutory-authority veterans-affairs veterans-court |
Does the Veterans Court have statutory or inherent authority to include veterans whose individual claims are not yet exhausted in a class seeking inju… |
14.5 |
| 22-865 |
Mobilize the Message, LLC, et al. v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (4) |
campaign-finance campaign-material civil-rights content-based-regulation content-based-restriction first-amendment free-speech independent-contractor independent-contractors political-canvassing political-speech speech-regulation |
Whether regulating canvassing and the delivery of printed material based on that speech's content, function, or purpose implicates the First Amendment… |
14.5 |
| 22-890 |
Quad Graphics, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Revenue |
North Carolina |
Denied |
Amici (4) |
commerce-clause constitutional-interpretation due-process interstate-sales judicial-precedent out-of-state-sales precedent state-courts state-taxation supreme-court-precedent |
In McLeod v. J. E. Dilworth Co., 322 U.S. 327 (1944),
this Court held that a state may not tax sales that occur
outside its borders, even when the pur… |
14.5 |
| 22-607 |
Noah Nagy, Warden v. Jimmy Baugh |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
actual-innocence constitutional-error criminal-procedure federal-review habeas-corpus new-evidence sixth-amendment standard-of-review statutory-interpretation |
Did the Sixth Circuit misapprehend § 2244(b)(2)(B)(ii)'s standard by granting habeas relief to Jimmy Baugh when the newly discovered evidence at issue… |
14.0 |
| 22-846 |
Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Reginald Kirtz |
Third Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (2)Relisted (3) |
civil-liability civil-procedure fair-credit-reporting-act federal-jurisdiction federal-law sovereign-immunity statutory-interpretation waiver |
Whether the civil-liability provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., unequivocally and unambiguously waive the sovereign i… |
13.5 |
| 22-347 |
Diece-Lisa Industries, Inc. v. Disney Store USA, LLC, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
GVR |
Response RequestedRelisted (3) |
expressive-work first-amendment intellectual-property likelihood-of-confusion reverse-confusion trademark-infringement trademark-law |
1. Does the First Amendment provide an infringer blanket immunity for trademark infringement across all categories of goods so long as they can claim … |
11.5 |
| 22-759 |
Michael Gramins v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
|
appellate-review civil-rights fraud fraud-statutes legal-interpretation materiality negotiating-position statutory-interpretation transaction-disclosure transaction-terms |
Whether, for purposes of the federal fraud statutes, misstatements are immaterial when they pertain only to a party's negotiating position and all ter… |
10.5 |
| 22-827 |
Carlos Herrera, Daniel Sanchez, and Anthony Ray Baca v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
|
commerce-clause constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge post-trial-motion rule-12 waiver |
Whether, under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12, Petitioners were permitted to bring a facial constitutional challenge to their statute of convic… |
10.5 |
| 22-844 |
Hamid Akhavan and Ruben Weigand v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
|
confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination exceptional-circumstances remote-testimony sixth-amendment trial-procedure |
Whether the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment is violated by denying a criminal defendant the right to cross-examine a key prosecution witne… |
10.5 |
| 22-598 |
Arthur Bedrosian v. United States, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-penalty civil-procedure due-process foreign-account foreign-account-reporting irs objective-standard statutory-interpretation subjective-standard tax willful-violation willfulness |
Whether willfulness under 31 U.S.C. § 5321(a)(5)(C) should be determined according to a subjective, rather than objective, standard that focuses on an… |
10.0 |
| 22-1098 |
David Parsons Demarest v. Town of Underhill, Vermont, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
due-process federal-court-jurisdiction federal-courts property-rights retroactive-application retroactivity statute-of-limitations takings takings-litigation |
1. When Knick changed the world of takings
litigation by allowing—for the first time since
1985—a property owner with a claim for
unconstitutional tak… |
9.5 |
| 22-1011 |
Tony Holt v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al. |
Illinois |
Denied |
Response Waived |
4th-amendment appellate-court circuit-split civil-rights due-process evidentiary-standard illinois-v-gates judicial-precedent probable-cause standing |
Does the Appellate Court's bright-line rule on probable cause, which presumes that information from a purported victim is inherently reliable, violate… |
8.5 |
| 22-1050 |
Cedric Epple v. Albany Unified School District, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1983 administrative-actions civil-rights due-process exhaustion federal-court judicial-exhaustion ninth-circuit section-1983 state-court-remedies summary-reversal |
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding, in direct conflict with this Court's precedent, that litigants challenging administrative actions must … |
8.5 |
| 22-874 |
Andrew Meisner, Oakland County Treasurer, et al. v. Tawanda Hall, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-law due-process equitable-title foreclosure municipal-law property-rights surplus-proceeds takings takings-clause tax-delinquency tax-foreclosure |
Whether foreclosing on a home for the nonpayment of taxes constitutes a violation of the federal Takings Clause whenever the home is worth more than t… |
8.5 |
| 22-769 |
Weixing V. Wang v. Brandywyne Common Condominium |
New Hampshire |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process evidence-rules federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-evidence judicial-misconduct standing summary-judgment |
1. Solely with the lies and fabricated numbers on paper, without even one evidence, how can Petitioner be ordered to pay $47,319.86?
2. In a civil ca… |
6.0 |
| 22-1001 |
NST Global, LLC, dba SB Tactical v. Sig Sauer Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
|
administrative-procedure administrative-procedure-act burden-of-proof due-process federal-circuit federal-circuit-rule-36 inter-partes-review patent-construction patent-preamble patent-validity |
1. Whether the Federal Circuit's affirmance of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision that results from the Board's sua sponte construction of a… |
5.5 |
| 22-1003 |
Mucio Ramirez v. Christopher Martin |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
|
civil-rights excessive-force fourth-amendment graham-standard graham-v-connor police-brutality police-misconduct qualified-immunity reasonable-force use-of-force |
No dispute exists that Petitioner was intoxicated when Respondent assaulted him, but the police tried to stop Petitioner for a broken taillight. Petit… |
5.5 |
| 22-1004 |
Kurt Garrison v. City of Ottawa, Kansas, et al. |
Kansas |
Denied |
|
constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-bias prejudice procedural-due-process professional-engineering right-to-trial-by-jury standard-of-review substantive-due-process |
1. Whether substantive due process applied by the
state district court when erroneously dismissing this
case with no evidentiary hearing, without di… |
5.5 |
| 22-885 |
South Carolina v. Angela D. Brewer |
South Carolina |
Denied |
|
confrontation-clause crawford-v-washington criminal-procedure expert-testimony forensic-evidence forensic-pathology melendez-diaz-v-massachusetts ohio-v-clark sixth-amendment testimonial-evidence testimonial-statements |
Whether lab results requested not by law enforcement but by a forensic pathologist to assist in making a routine cause of death determination are test… |
5.5 |
| 22-994 |
Wall Street Apartments, LLC, et al. v. All Star Property Management, LLC, et al. |
Washington |
Denied |
|
access-to-court appellate-procedure constitutional-rights court-hearing decision-based-on-record due-process equal-protection judicial-review meaningful-hearing scrutiny-of-state-court-proceedings |
Appellants seek review of a judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of Washington denying Appellants' petition of review of the Washington Court of… |
5.5 |
| 22-996 |
Tawanda Hall, et al. v. Andrew Meisner, Oakland County Treasurer, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
|
civil-forfeiture civil-procedure civil-punishment constitutional-law due-process eighth-amendment excessive-fines excessive-fines-clause property-forfeiture takings tax-foreclosure |
Whether the forfeiture of property worth far more than needed to satisfy a debt plus interest, penalties, and costs is a fine within the meaning of th… |
5.5 |
| 22-997 |
Andrew Lewis v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
|
criminal-procedure habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel medical-evidence medical-testimony prejudice-analysis standard-of-review strickland-standard strickland-v-washington trial-counsel |
Whether the TCCA, by considering only the trial testimony that supported the convictions rather than how the testimony of petitioner's medical experts… |
5.5 |
| 22A1002 |
Gina Russomanno v. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 22A978 |
Ronald Boyajian v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 22M113 |
R. J. Kulick v. Beverly Vandermeulen, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 22M114 |
Sealed Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 22-1010 |
Robert A. Heghmann, et ux. v. Djamel Hafiani, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
automatic-stay bankruptcy-court-jurisdiction bankruptcy-jurisdiction circuit-split compensatory-damages district-court district-court-jurisdiction punitive-damages status-quo |
1. Does the Bankruptcy Court or the U.S. District Court, or both, have jurisdiction to entertain a complaint filed by a debtor seeking compensatory an… |
3.5 |
| 22-1044 |
Jose Isrrael Gonzalez-Vega v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
None |
|
3.5 |
| 22-1076 |
Online Merchants Guild v. Nicolas Maduros, Director, California Department of Tax and Free Administration |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
cic-services-llc-v-internal-revenue-service comity-doctrine direct-marketing-association-v-brohl federal-jurisdiction information-demands online-merchants putative-taxpayer state-tax-demands tax-injunction-act third-party |
1. The text of the Tax Injunction Act only prevents federal courts from hearing claims that would enjoin the "assessment, levy, or collection" of stat… |
3.5 |
| 22-1086 |
Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva v. Department of Veteran Affairs, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appeals civil-procedure court-authority due-process federal-courts federal-rules-civil-procedure jurisdiction procedural-defect service-of-process standing summons-requirements |
1) Did both the U.S. District Courts for the Northern District of California (Judge Alsup) and the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico … |
3.5 |
| 22-1088 |
John T. Morris v. Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
accumulated-knowledge article-1-section-2 constitutional-interpretation election-integrity first-amendment frequent-elections political-rights redistricting voter-participation voting-rights |
1. Are frequent elections implied in Article 1, Section 2
Clause 1 of the United States Constitution that were
meant by the Framers of the Constitut… |
3.5 |
| 22-1103 |
Edward Bronson v. Securities and Exchange Commission |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review circuit-court-order civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-sanctions due-process injunctive-relief penalties punitive-sanctions standing statutory-penalties supreme-court-precedent |
Whether the Summary Order of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit conflicts with decisions of this Court in: Kokesh v. S.E.C., Liu v. S.E.C., a… |
3.5 |
| 22-1108 |
Reuben Haley v. Urban Outfitters, Inc. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review burden-of-proof civil-procedure due-process equal-protection judicial-review legal-standard standard-of-review summary-judgment |
Whether the grant of summary judgment against petitioner was error? |
3.5 |
| 22-6798 |
Ronald Jeffrey Prible v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)IFP |
brady-claim brady-v-maryland cause circuit-split due-diligence evidence-suppression federal-habeas habeas-corpus procedural-default suppression |
1. Whether, to establish "suppression" under Brady
v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and the parallel
"cause" to excuse procedural default of a Brad… |
1.5 |
| 22-5460 |
Bradley Lane Croft v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
GVR |
Relisted (2)IFP |
aggravated-identity-theft circuit-split criminal-procedure discretionary-review federal-question identity-theft money-laundering sufficiency-of-evidence wire-fraud |
Whether an accused commits the crime of aggravated identity theft by merely uttering, mentioning, or reciting someone else's name when committing frau… |
1.0 |
| 22-6129 |
Artak Ovsepian v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
GVR |
Relisted (2)IFP |
certiorari criminal-procedure dubin-case due-process habeas-corpus ninth-circuit petition-for-writ remand supreme-court supreme-court-procedure vacatur |
Whether this Court should hold this petition and then grant, vacate, and remand for reconsideration in light of the pending opinion in Dubin v. United… |
1.0 |
| 22-6593 |
Steven C. Heiser v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2)IFP |
abuse-of-discretion certificate-of-appealability certiorari-jurisdiction due-process habeas-corpus limitations-defense party-presentation statute-of-limitations sua-sponte |
Mr. Heiser humbly asks this Honorable Court to invoke its judicial discretion and consider the following questions:
1. THIS COURT SHOULD EXERCISE ITS… |
1.0 |
| 22-7302 |
Derek Skellchock v. Alora-Ann Volz |
Colorado |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
collateral-estoppel disability-compensation federal-preemption judicial-review res-judicata state-court-jurisdiction state-domestic-relations supremacy-clause veterans-benefits |
1. Where the federal agency with "exclusive jurisdiction" over "all questions of law and fact" concerning a dependent's claim for a portion of a veter… |
1.0 |
| 22-6998 |
David Arroyo-Ramon v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-precedent legal-standard precedent-overturning recidivism sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review |
Whether this Court should overrule its decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). |
0.5 |
| 22-7016 |
Guadalupe Onate-Herrera v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
burden-of-proof criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process indictment jury-trial prior-convictions sentencing statutory-maximum |
Whether all facts—including the fact of a prior conviction—that increase a defendant's statutory maximum must be pleaded in the indictment and either … |
0.5 |
| 22-7025 |
Kevin Ariel Garcia-Archaga v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
almendarez-torres apprendi-v-new-jersey constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure historical-practices notice-clause prior-conviction-exception sixth-amendment |
Whether the prior-conviction exception from Almendarez-Torres can be squared with the text of the Sixth Amendment's Notice Clause and the historical p… |
0.5 |
| 22-5891 |
Kevin B. Burns v. Tony Mays, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (7)IFP |
capital-punishment capital-sentencing felony-murder ineffective-assistance moral-culpability residual-doubt sentencing state-law strickland-v-washington |
1. Whether an ineffective assistance claim may be based on counsel's
failure to exercise a state-law right to introduce residual doubt evidence at a c… |
-0.5 |
| 22-7605 |
Sealed Appellant v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
bad-faith cooperation cooperation-agreement criminal-procedure due-process government-misconduct guilty-plea plea-bargaining prosecutorial-discretion section-3553e sentencing sentencing-relief |
Did the government act in bad faith by denying 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) relief to Petitioner when, after securing his guilty plea with the promise that it … |
-1.0 |
| 22-7266 |
Levar Lee Spence v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
Denied |
IFP |
appeal-rights appellate-review brady-violations constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus self-representation statutory-authorization statutory-interpretation |
I. Did the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision provide the necessary warrant of authority to Subsume the Constitutional Writ of Habeas Corpus ad sobti… |
-4.5 |
| 22-7267 |
Lloyd Leslie Kindred v. T. Cisneros, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
6th-amendment constitutional-rights criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-assistance interest-of-justice outcome-determination prejudicial-error reasonable-probability sixth-amendment |
Brawnds(f), tas J deated the 6TH mend ment oF Heo VU, Lornctidubion: Ke oarebing Lown sed s Pray Mianee. Wa ad teas onobhy et&ti ve"and Hrat Here /5 a… |
-4.5 |
| 22-7271 |
Gregg Haden v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment 6th-amendment civil-rights confrontation-clause constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-review supreme-court-precedent texas-procedure |
ynoc^dut*. FaII ,'fcj Ut-jDer TU< 4 CRuTny Of
Ttl<. Bull Com', -^TAA/ cIario AM) Vio IA Ti'hQ TH< FT/J
hmtksOmcnT THAT iS To STATcS THROUGH
Ttt& IHm… |
-4.5 |
| 22-7274 |
Jorge Galeas, Jr. v. Adam Gibson, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
10th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus independent-state-ground procedural-default state-court-decision strickler-v-greene |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 22-7280 |
Richard Ralph Martinez v. Michelle Lujan Grisham, Governor of New Mexico, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-procedure determinate-sentencing due-process habeas-corpus indeterminate-sentencing judicial-review life-sentence new-mexico parole parole-eligibility sentencing |
1. Whether Petitioner's allegations of violation, abridgment and denial of his constitutional rights by the named defendants' ignoring and violating t… |
-4.5 |
| 22-7281 |
Steven Ray Rouse v. North Carolina |
North Carolina |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-rights discovery discovery-violations due-process evidence ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-procedure prosecutorial-misconduct witness-identification |
THE VELES IS BR-2F4,.50 EVEWLTWES DDENTLEICATION REFORM ACT, WHY IS THERE WAT A ETERUNE OF THE DEFEBANNT? DT HE SCEWE, DARK IW THE BALK OF THE PATHOL … |
-4.5 |
| 22-7291 |
Eric J. Mapes, et ux. v. Cable One, dba Sparklight |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
accessibility court-procedure disability-discrimination disability-rights due-process federal-rehabilitation-act judicial-corruption judicial-discrimination tennessee-v-lane |
Where public Court employees of the lower Courts violate the Disability Rights and Federal Rehabilitation Act laws 29 U.S.C. 794 et seq. announced in … |
-4.5 |
| 22-7297 |
Lawrence Edward Thompson v. Allred Unit |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law civil-rights equal-protection fair-housing-act standing statutory-interpretation |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 22-7299 |
In Re Howard Griffith |
|
Denied |
IFP |
circuit-court-of-appeals civil-procedure civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus pro-se-petition service-of-documents sex-offender-registry standing |
Why should Petitioner not have to serve his documents which are filed in the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, with regar… |
-4.5 |
| 22-7315 |
Gregory Dean Barren, Sr. v. Nevada |
Nevada |
Denied |
IFP |
adjudication certification charges-dismissed due-process juvenile-court-act kent-v-united-states transfer-motion transfer-to-juvenile-jurisdiction unlawful-charges |
Did the State of Nevada violate the Juvenile Court Act announced in Kent v. United States by denying Petitioner's Motion to Transfer back to juvenile … |
-4.5 |
| 22-7321 |
Schuyler Scarborough v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus retroactivity right-to-counsel state-criminal-procedure |
akMtr+k*' ifoh- of tthfitkA a
Ade.i^c{>f>or^rh^ fft^ te ^
dwltd fh<o ostiehuu*. of Ceufi^l -for bus d&tlASt. ./.
uiht-fbitr-0ie~^fah- e-f OkUah&Ma. t… |
-4.5 |
| 22-7322 |
Tevaris Crawford v. Mack Bailey, Warden |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
appeals appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure due-process fourth-circuit habeas-corpus judicial-review legal-error standing writ-of-certiorari |
Did the Appeals Court of the Fourth Circuit error by denying a certificate of appealability? |
-4.5 |
| 22-7419 |
Cronie Lloyd v. Ohio |
Ohio |
Denied |
IFP |
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel misunderstanding-of-law presumption-of-competence reasonable-trial-strategy state-federal-court-split strickland-v-washington |
When this Court established a presumption of competence and reasonable trial strategy in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.… |
-4.5 |
| 22-7656 |
In Re Brad Edmonds |
|
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourth-amendment gps-tracking habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance plea-negotiations privacy search-and-seizure standing |
Whether the United States court of Appeals previously addressed GPS tracking warrant and in conflict with a lower court of appeals and Supreme court?
… |
-4.5 |
| 22-6797 |
Dominick Galluzzo v. Internal Revenue Service |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
attorney-misconduct bankruptcy bankruptcy-procedure irs iRS-assessment judicial-misconduct proof-of-claim tax-court tax-dispute venue venue-selection |
Was I mis represented at bankruptcy by my attorney not asking for attachments to PROOF OF CLIAM accoding to
rule 3001 and B10 (exhibits H & I)
At 20… |
-6.0 |
| 22-6915 |
Leon H. McCormick v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process standing statutory-interpretation |
Question not identified. |
-6.0 |
| 22-7112 |
Fuhai Li v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
certificate-of-appealability constitutional-claims due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review jurisdiction probable-cause procedural-default standard-of-review unconstitutional-search-and-seizure |
I. The Court of Appeals' decision denying Petitioner's request for a COA is Contrary to a decision of this court because it sidestepped the COA Proces… |
-6.0 |
| 22-7223 |
Raymond Charles Lee v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
142-s-ct-2389-2022 case-compliance civil-procedure concepcion-v-united-states due-process judicial-review legal-remand remand standing statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent |
WHETHER THIS CASE SHOULD BE REMANDED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH CONCEPCION V UNITED STATES, 142 S.T. 2389 (2022) |
-6.0 |
| 22-7415 |
Ricky Pendleton v. Donald Ames, Superintendent, Mt. Olive Correctional Center |
West Virginia |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
constructive-amendment due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel notice pro-se res-judicata |
Whether the State courts's doctrine of res judicata was applied adequately after it summarily denies Pendleton's pro se filings of the successive habe… |
-6.0 |
| 22-7268 |
Derek Sloane v. Robert L. Langley, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appointment-of-counsel civil-rights due-process federal-procedural-rules imminent-danger imminent-danger-exception in-forma-pauperis prisoner-litigation pro-se-appeal standing statutory-interpretation three-strikes-rule |
THAT THIS ACTION SHOULDN'T HAD BEEN DISMISS BECAUSE APPELLANT HAS THREE STRIKES AND IF SO, WHETHER HE IS ENTITLED TO IN-VOKE THE IMMINENT DANGER EXCEP… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7306 |
Keith Thomas v. Bank of America, N.A., et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
1st-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech judicial-procedure rule-11 sanctions seventh-amendment standing |
1. Did the district court improperly apply Rule 11 sanctions against this petitioner basically stripping him of his 1st amendment rights and 7th amend… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7328 |
Carroll Wayne Haynes v. Louisiana |
Louisiana |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights consent-decree department-of-justice due-process federal-court prosecution |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 22-7331 |
Maria Navarro-Martin v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus malicious-prosecution perjury standing |
oH-e^et djJ <\ r^f 1 (<&*\ ft
0~£~ ^ai>ea/> C^v^js d)eemeci ctoe&pkcf t kjjl . ^ \~f
^W-^ csf Gnur ( i
-ftv~ WcuU cf- proS^ca Uc/m
Ipv^S^atcofLGvi e… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7397 |
Daniel Kim v. Massachusetts |
Massachusetts |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure criminal-speech due-process fighting-words first-amendment free-speech jury-determination jury-instructions speech-protection state-court true-threats |
1. Whether a state court is prohibited from unilaterally determining whether a defendant's written speech on his blog is protected or criminal, withou… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7400 |
Maurice Morrison v. Massachusetts |
Massachusetts |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
confrontation-clause confrontation-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence fourteenth-amendment judicial-protection jury-deliberations jury-trial sixth-amendment trial-evidence |
A person accused of a crime is entitled to have his guilt or innocence determined solely on the basis of evidence introduced at trial. Taylor v. Kentu… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7441 |
Colette Claire Savage v. Mark Savage |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights due-process government-corruption judicial-discrimination motion-to-dismiss pro-se pro-se-litigation standing |
1. Are motions to dismiss used administratively to hastily dispose of meritorious and government corruption cases especially targeting pro se litigant… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7487 |
Travis Carter v. Louisiana |
Louisiana |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-economy montgomery-precedent montgomery-v-louisiana sixth-amendment standing state-v-reddick takings |
1. Does the State of Louisiana have the express right to invoke the defense of
"judicial economy " as a ruse for plausible deniability; especially whe… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7492 |
Cedric Winston O'Neal v. Craig Hughes, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
8th-amendment constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process eighth-amendment juvenile-justice mandatory-penalty mandatory-transfer miller-v-alabama montgomery-v-louisiana |
Are Mandatory Transfer Schemes also apart of SCOTUS' 8th Amendment ban of mandatory penalty schemes against children?
Did the United States Supreme C… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7562 |
Joseph Tetak v. Jay Forshey, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review constitutional-interpretation constitutional-issue deference-standard federal-habeas-corpus habeas-corpus judicial-precedent stare-decisis state-supreme-court subjective-objective-analysis |
Does the doctrine of stare decisis prevail on a state supreme
court's determination of a constitutional issue in the same manner
as this Court's deter… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7595 |
Arnoldo Navarette v. Vincent Horton, Warden, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure effective-assistance-of-counsel evidence ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment trial |
h |Q\fy| C'vV €:M*r %.tf b
| be
vaU^^* "7
"lo^ »7 ti> ■ c\ -Vm
ILO' r 3C
k\ ^ % t hr. *
{0icC^\^ ^ S' ^ v| ^<& |
-6.5 |
| 22-7599 |
Curtis Marcel Barnette v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process government-prosecution plea-agreement plea-bargaining right-to-appeal waiver |
DOES IT VIOLATE DUE PROCESS FOR A DEFENDANT TO BE
REQUIRED TO WAIVE HIS RIGHT TO APPEAL IN ORDER TO ENTER INTO
AN OTHERWISE FAVORABLE PLEA AGREEMENT W… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7606 |
Yvette Crystal Wade v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-1951 18-usc-924 crime-of-violence elements-clause hobbs-act physical-force sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
Whether Hobbs Act robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 1951 is a crime of violence under the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(8)(A), where the offense encom… |
-6.5 |
| 22-7623 |
Arquimedes Mendoza v. Jeff Macomber, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-right criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel padilla-standard padilla-v-kentucky plea-bargaining reasonable-defendant reasonable-person |
Whether, it is enough for a defendant claiming ineffective assistance of counsel in the plea context to back his claim with substantial contemporaneou… |
-6.5 |