No. 22-6129
Artak Ovsepian v. United States
Tags: certiorari criminal-procedure dubin-case due-process habeas-corpus ninth-circuit petition-for-writ remand supreme-court supreme-court-procedure vacatur
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-06-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this Court should hold this petition and then grant, vacate, and remand for reconsideration in light of the pending opinion in Dubin v. United States, No. 22-10.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court should hold this petition and then grant, vacate, and remand for reconsideration in light of the pending opinion in Dubin v. United States, No. 22-10
Docket Entries
2023-07-24
Judgment issued.
2023-06-20
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Dubin</i> v. <i>United States</i>, 599 U. S. ___ (2023).
2023-06-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-02-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-01-23
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2022-12-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 23, 2023.
2022-12-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 23, 2022 to January 23, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-11-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 23, 2022)
Attorneys
Artak Ovsepian
Benjamin Lee Coleman — Benjamin L. Coleman Law PC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent