No. 22-7441

Colette Claire Savage v. Mark Savage

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-05-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights due-process government-corruption judicial-discrimination motion-to-dismiss pro-se pro-se-litigation standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-06-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Are motions to dismiss used administratively to hastily dispose of meritorious and government corruption cases especially targeting pro se litigants?

2. Are pro se litigants a commonly discriminated class of people throughout the United States court system?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Are motions to dismiss used administratively to hastily dispose of meritorious and government corruption cases especially targeting pro se litigants?

Docket Entries

2023-06-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-05-23
Waiver of right of respondent Mark Savage to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2022-04-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 1, 2023)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service
2022-03-11
Application (21A497) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 9, 2022.
2022-03-02
Application (21A497) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 10, 2022 to May 9, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Main DocumentLower Court Orders/OpinionsMain DocumentLower Court Orders/Opinions

Attorneys

Colette Claire Savage
Colette Claire Savage — Petitioner
Mark Savage
Robert Loewy Nelson — Attorney at Law, Respondent