THE VELES IS BR-2F4,.50 EVEWLTWES DDENTLEICATION REFORM ACT, WHY IS THERE WAT A ETERUNE OF THE DEFEBANNT? DT HE SCEWE, DARK IW THE BALK OF THE PATHOL OAR, WITNESS SAYS. tHE STPTE TROOPER PIP MoT. VON HRVE BL FUDSHELG RT 086 THE PLOTURE HSED WAS NOT K PLICTVLE AT SCEWE.

THE W665 I5SA- 264,52 (13) EYEWLIWESS IDEWTLEICATION Rerorem ACT. Why Is STE _RAY ROUSE 06-28-64 OW THE BOTTO" OF THE WETWVESS STATEMENT? THAD PEVER. SAW THIS MAN BEFORE AWD _E itwvep A" mile rH RdveH THE WoSDs, WERE L Aur And FISH.

THE STATES WETWESS ITWFACT TOD THE Court, HE DID MOT SEE sTéVew R, RovsE DRIVERG, WHY DID Lhwyle (Ltk PAMTTE) a MoT PersvE HES!

THE STATES WITVESS KIETH BOWLINMG INFACT TOLD the Cet, HE BID MOT SELF _STEVER RAY ROUSE pRivin'. WAY DID LAWYER (Ritk FARPOTTE) wor peRsue tHrs*

STATES WITWESS GALLY GREW Fold THE CovRT HE DID NOT SEE STEVE RIF _(UQUSE DRIVING. WHY DID Laurer Qerek paeeorie) 110T PERSUE THES.

HOw COU) LAWYER CRICK FARQUTTE) SEND STEVEN RAY Rouse At DISCOVERY OF 3% fbCS AIVD 1? WERE DUrPcLenTes ©

Hw) CoviD THES BE THE PETITIONER DISCovKy

How Coy THE GWE 159-925 AVBYOO) , OF piscoveky, BE Com PrrereL/ AVOLDED ®

How CluiD THE LAWS COVERING THE USE OF DISCOVERY BE TOrhly LENoREDE.

How CowiD THE FLLGAT LWSTRVETLOW BE _) WEN, WHER THERE Wits Mo FLIGHTS

wily Din carer (iSite PACROTTE) AGREE TO eye currtnG oF 1H Boby bh eC

WAY WAS (speven &, RovsSé) ONLY GET To SEE 23 MIN ures of % 40 minvil€e FILLE. ce 7

wity wR ana 31S A-YOl CD) wor vsED © pur nto €FECTS WHY Wel DEPUTTES 867 KEETA Bowen &, (who Wo Wnge7e LIBEK? roe mewsultele 00) AnD DOTY baer Gebel AtLww ED To VSE EyCESSIVE FORCE

How could lawyer (Rick Farqutte) send Steven Ray Rouse at discovery of 3 facts and 1? were duplicates?