No. 22-759
Michael Gramins v. United States
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights fraud fraud-statutes legal-interpretation materiality negotiating-position statutory-interpretation transaction-disclosure transaction-terms
Latest Conference:
2023-06-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, for purposes of the federal fraud statutes, misstatements are immaterial when they pertain only to a party's negotiating position and all terms of the transaction are disclosed.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, for purposes of the federal fraud statutes, misstatements are immaterial when they pertain only to a party's negotiating position and all terms of the transaction are disclosed
Docket Entries
2023-06-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-05-30
Reply of petitioner Michael Gramins filed. (Distributed)
2023-05-15
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-04-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 15, 2023.
2023-04-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 14, 2023 to May 15, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 14, 2023.
2023-03-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 15, 2023 to April 14, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 15, 2023)
2022-12-30
Application (22A576) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until February 9, 2023.
2022-12-22
Application (22A576) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 10, 2023 to February 9, 2023, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Michael Gramins
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent