Whether the TCCA, by considering only the trial testimony that supported the convictions rather than how the testimony of petitioner's medical experts at the state habeas hearing, if presented at trial, probably would have affected the verdicts, failed to conduct the "probing and fact-specific" prejudice analysis required by Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).

Whether the TCCA failed to conduct the 'probing and fact-specific' prejudice analysis required by Strickland v. Washington