No. 22-7112
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability constitutional-claims due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review jurisdiction probable-cause procedural-default standard-of-review unconstitutional-search-and-seizure
Latest Conference:
2023-06-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. The Court of Appeals' decision denying Petitioner's request for a COA is Contrary to a decision of this court because it sidestepped the COA Process by deciding the merit of an appeal first and thus decided Petitioner's appeal without jurisdiction.
II. The Court of Appeals' decision denying Petitioner's request for a COA is Contrary to the decision of this Court because reasonable crisis would find the district Court's Assessments of Petitioner's constitutional Claims in the §2255 motion Wrong or debatable.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of appeals' decision denying Petitioner's request for a COA is contrary to the decision of this Court
Docket Entries
2023-06-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-05-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-05-15
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-04-24
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-03-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-03-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 28, 2023)
Attorneys
Fuhai Li
Fuhai Li — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent