No. 22-7656

In Re Brad Edmonds

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2023-05-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourth-amendment gps-tracking habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance plea-negotiations privacy search-and-seizure standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2023-06-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the United States court of Appeals previously addressed GPS tracking warrant and in conflict with a lower court of appeals and Supreme court?

Was this control regarding GPS tracking addressed in any of the sued ok any courts in the United States?

Did the officers violated MR. Eelmonds fourth amendment right when the officers physically instructed an Me Eelmonds cak to obtain information by installing abs thu without a warrant and first fourth MR. Eolmands. Garnse 97k?

Was R. Jones, case already retroactively applied?

Was evidence obtained from a GPS device in this result of ineffective assistance of counsel?

Did Fairfax county police illegally entered the State and without a warrant as a physically instructed to obtain cat to install a GPS device?

Did this court address GPS tracks about a person Dale transner at the care 7 FOE?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the warrantless installation and use of a GPS tracking device on a vehicle violates the Fourth Amendment

Docket Entries

2023-09-08
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-08-17
DISTRIBUTED.
2023-07-14
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-06-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-04-18

Attorneys

Edmonds, In Re Brad
Brad Edmonds — Petitioner