No. 22-5460
Bradley Lane Croft v. United States
Tags: aggravated-identity-theft circuit-split criminal-procedure discretionary-review federal-question identity-theft money-laundering sufficiency-of-evidence wire-fraud
Latest Conference:
2023-06-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether an accused commits the crime of aggravated identity theft by merely uttering, mentioning, or reciting someone else's name when committing fraud or any other predicate offense.
Whether the evidence is insufficient to support the wire fraud conviction, and consequently the money laundering conviction, in this case.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an accused commits aggravated-identity-theft by merely uttering-someone's-name
Docket Entries
2023-07-24
Judgment issued.
2023-06-20
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Dubin v. United States, 599 U. S. ___ (2023).
2023-06-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2022-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-28
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2022-10-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 28, 2022.
2022-10-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 28, 2022 to November 28, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-09-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 28, 2022.
2022-09-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 28, 2022 to October 28, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-08-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 28, 2022)
Attorneys
Bradley Croft
James Scott Sullivan — Law Offices of J. Scott Sullivan, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent