No. 22-607

Noah Nagy, Warden v. Jimmy Baugh

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-01-03
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: actual-innocence constitutional-error criminal-procedure federal-review habeas-corpus new-evidence sixth-amendment standard-of-review statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Securities
Latest Conference: 2023-06-15 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the Sixth Circuit misapprehend § 2244(b)(2)(B)(ii)'s standard by granting habeas relief to Jimmy Baugh when the newly discovered evidence at issue provided a strong alternative theory of guilt and further inculpated Baugh as an active participant in the murder?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Sixth Circuit misapprehend § 2244(b)(2)(B)(ii)'s standard by granting habeas relief to Jimmy Baugh when the newly discovered evidence at issue provided a strong alternative theory of guilt and further inculpated Baugh as an active participant in the murder?

Docket Entries

2023-06-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-05-24
2023-05-15
2023-04-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 15, 2023.
2023-04-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 5, 2023 to May 15, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 5, 2023.
2023-02-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 6, 2023 to May 5, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-03
Response Requested. (Due March 6, 2023)
2023-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-26
Waiver of right of respondent Jimmy Baugh to respond filed.
2022-12-29

Attorneys

Jimmy Baugh
Christopher J. McGrathChristopher J. McGrath, PLLC, Respondent
Noah Nagy, Warden
Ann Maurine ShermanMichigan Department of Attorney General, Petitioner