No. 22-7321
Schuyler Scarborough v. Oklahoma
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus retroactivity right-to-counsel state-criminal-procedure
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-06-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
akMtr+k*' ifoh- of tthfitkA a
Ade.i^c{>f>or^rh^ fft^ te ^
dwltd fh<o ostiehuu*. of Ceufi^l -for bus d&tlASt. ./.
uiht-fbitr-0ie~^fah- e-f OkUah&Ma. trtcorrbcffy olassi-fi^A
■tb''i> Cittffi de.G6ion //] /rfcirH- a& a ne*J procedural ruler.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether the State of Oklahoma afforded petitioner a constitutionally adequate opportunity to receive the assistance of Counsel for his case
Docket Entries
2023-06-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-04-06
Application (22A869) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until June 8, 2023.
2023-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 19, 2023)
2023-03-20
Application (22A869) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 9, 2023 to June 8, 2023, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Schuyler Scarborough
Schuyler Scarborough — #125148-F-104, Petitioner