No. 22-1011
Tony Holt v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: 4th-amendment appellate-court circuit-split civil-rights due-process evidentiary-standard illinois-v-gates judicial-precedent probable-cause standing
Latest Conference:
2023-06-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the Appellate Court's bright-line rule on probable cause, which presumes that information from a purported victim is inherently reliable, violate the Supreme Court's decision in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983)?
Does the Appellate Court's bright-line rule on probable cause create a circuit split amongst federal and state courts and set Illinois courts at odds with the federal courts regarding the establishment of probable cause?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Appellate Court's bright-line rule on probable cause violate Illinois v. Gates?
Docket Entries
2023-06-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-04-27
Waiver of right of respondents The City of Chicago, et al. to respond filed.
2023-04-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 17, 2023)
2023-02-07
Application (22A708) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until April 14, 2023.
2023-02-02
Application (22A708) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 28, 2023 to April 14, 2023, submitted to Justice Barrett.
Attorneys
The City of Chicago, et al.
Myriam Zreczny Kasper — City of Chicago Department of Law, Respondent
Tony Holt
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner