No. 22-7595
Arnoldo Navarette v. Vincent Horton, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure effective-assistance-of-counsel evidence ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment trial
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-06-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
h |Q\fy| C'vV €:M*r %.tf b
| be
vaU^^* "7
"lo^ »7 ti> ■ c\ -Vm
ILO' r 3C
k\ ^ % t hr. *
{0icC^\^ ^ S' ^ v| ^<&
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel was violated when his defense attorney failed to present certain evidence at trial
Docket Entries
2023-06-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-05-23
Waiver of right of respondent Vincent Horton, Warden. et al. to respond filed.
2023-05-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 20, 2023)
Attorneys
Arnoldo Navarette
Arnoldo Navarette — Petitioner
Vincent Horton, Warden. et al.
Jane Alissa Bernstein — New Mexico Attorney General, Respondent