No. 18-7616

Rodrigo Tovar Pupo v. United States

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2019-02-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal constitutional-issue constitutional-issues criminal-appeal criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-appeal district-court due-process guilty-plea ineffective-assistance-of-counsel offense-enhancement plea-bargaining sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-03-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

If Appeals Court erred by not considering the grounds raised by Appellant and denying his appeal disregarding the Constitutional issues raised by Appellant.

If the District Court erred in denying Appellant's motion to withdraw guilty plea.

If the District Court erred when it enhanced Appellant's offense level by two levels pursuant to U.S.S.G §2D1.1(B)(1).

If the District Court erred when it enhanced Appellant's offense level by 4 levels pursuant to U.S.S.G §3B1.1(A).

If District Court erred in not considering the conflicting interest of defendant's attorney as a significant one, affecting the results of the plea agreement.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

If Appeals Court erred by not considering the grounds raised by Appellant and denying his appeal disregarding the Constitutional issues raised by Appellant

Docket Entries

2019-03-04
Petition DENIED. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2018-06-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 4, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Rodrigo T. Pupo
Rodrigo T. Pupo — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent