DID PLAINT. BALEY FAIL TO SERVE DEFT. ROBINSON PER CIV.R?

WAS TE TRIAL DOCKET FALSIFIED?

WAS TRIAL HELD?

WAS ROBINSON ABLE TO GIVE ANSWER?

WAS ROBINSON PRESENT FOR ANY PROCEBDINES?

DID ROBINSON HAVE AN ATTORNEY APEAR ON HIS BETALF?

DID THAT ATTORNEY ANSEUER DAE COMPLANT?

WAS HS DUE PROCESS VIOLATED?

SHOULD THE TRIAL COURT HAVE RULED AGAINST ROBINSON AND AUARDED MONETARY TO PLAINT.?

DID THE 9TA DISF, COUR OF APPEALS FAIL TO REVIEW?

WAS THE BRIEF REPLID TO?

WAS A MENUORANDNM IN SUPPORT OF URISDICTION FWLEO TO SUPRENE COURT oF OHO?

HAS TAE SMATE OF OHO IGNORED MY ARGUNONES?

HAS THE UNITED STATES SUALETE COURT REVIEWED My ARGhES?

WIHAT'S THE PONT OF RECONSIDERATION S.CT.PRAC.R. 18OZ AND ORAL ARGUMENT IF IT IS SELDOM TO NEVER GRANTEO?

Whether the trial court falsified the trial docket, whether the trial was illegal, whether the plaintiff was denied the right to present evidence, whether the plaintiff was denied the right to have an attorney, whether the plaintiff's due process rights were violated, whether the trial court should have ruled against the defendant and awarded more damages to the plaintiff, whether the appeals court failed to review the trial court's ruling, whether the plaintiff filed a meritorious motion in support of jurisdiction, whether the plaintiff's claims have been ignored, whether the Supreme Court should hear this case