No. 23-5747
IFP
Tags: 8th-amendment appellate-jurisdiction civil-rights constitutional-issue due-process evidentiary-hearing federal-review habeas-corpus judicial-procedure newly-discovered-evidence post-conviction
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals properly denied Petitioner due process and Eighth Amendment rights by refusing to consider newly discovered evidence, granting no evidentiary hearing, and failing to correct clear constitutional violations
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2023-12-11
Supplemental brief of petitioner Daryl A. Hess filed. (Distributed)
2023-11-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-07-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2023)
Attorneys
Daryl A. Hess
Daryl A. Hess — Petitioner