Whether Rule 5.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures which wato in part; *A jnfiy Ik afewsd to "fife m Cpwptett, ffer Sa^ssstssme fs^Ssif ifaw^ ill® spasiissi ffe @ff m federal ersHtoe statute/' would apply to a federal statute, passed by Congress, that testes this Gouste SM» Pm€sss s awS to whkftr toe Mjgjh Gants ©f ife Sod^shep?

Whether the doctrine of vertical and horizontal "stare decisis" "shall" it he ifiiHi % toe toner chants* toe iWiwsgif or seufig ^sgesMlf as ft peiiaiBS'te tos Grads; dnatoms s® declfel issaes? And iff it shall be followed, was this doctrine properly followed in the petitioner^) cases? And iff it was nntr Assisi this Court be aBoweri to ip« toe harmful and hapaisiBS. enrms of toe- fiaaser smuts, a federal law passed by Congress?

Did the Lower Courts, in these matters improperly dismiss petitioner's] Hi.

Did the Judicial Act of 1925 Unconstitutionally move this Honorable Castaw^r Him® is €fe|paai toatsaane^ taharitaml.

Whether the lower court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims