No. 21-369
Tags: criminal-appellate-review criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law overruling-precedent stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma should be overruled
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-04
Reply of petitioner Oklahoma filed.
2021-10-22
Brief amicus curiae of Muscogee (Creek) Nation filed.
2021-10-22
Brief of respondent Bea A. Epperson in opposition filed.
2021-10-22
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Bea A. Epperson.
2021-10-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 8, 2021.
2021-10-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 8, 2021 to November 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-09-22
Letter from counsel for petitioner filed.
2021-09-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Bea A. Epperson
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
Muscogee (Creek) Nation
Riyaz Amir Kanji — Kanji & Kantzen, PLLC, Amicus
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner