Vernon D. F. Robbins v. John E. Wetzel, former Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.
1. Whether the United States fourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit has entered a
defision^tnat same United States Court of Appeals on the same decision in conflict with the
important matter concerning statutory prohibitions as it relates to pro se prisoner litigants'
administrative remedy exhaustions?
2. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has entered a
decision in conflict with the decision of another United States Court of Appeals on the same
important matter pertaining to statutory prohibtions as it relates to pro se litigants'
administrative remedy exhaustions?
3. Whether the United States Court of Appeals (Third Circuit) has entered a decision in conflict
with the same U.S. Court of Appeals decision as it pertains to applying the applicable law to pro se
litigants irrespective of whether it's mentioned by name?
4. Whether the United States Court of Appeals (Third Circuit) has decided an important
question of federal law in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of This Court concerning the
proy&ional authority of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) fashioned by Congress?
5. Whether the United States Court of Appeals (Third Circuit) has decided an important
question of federal law in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of This Court concerning Equal
Protection Rights for similarly situated plaintiffs?
6. Whether the United States Court of Appeals (Third Circuit) has decided an important
question of federal law in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of This Court concerning Stare
Decisis applications for precedential case decisions?
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has entered a decision in conflict with the decision of the same United States Court of Appeals on the same important matter concerning statutory prohibitions as it relates to pro-se-prisoner-litigants