Golda D. Harris v. Credit Acceptance Corporation, et al.
1. Is the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit allowed to substitute its decision(s) and
overrule the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. §§1-16 at §2 in the instant case in
opposition to the rulings of the Supreme Court of the United States holdings?
2. Are the U. S. Supreme Court stare decisis decisions applied equally as the law of the land to
protect against judicial discrimination and bias in the application of the law towards petitioner, a
pro se party filing against respondents an individual and a corporation party represented by an
attorney in the United States?
3. Why is the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit allowed to circumvent the holding of
Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfe. Co.. 388 U. S. 395 (19671 previously decided and
upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States to favor respondents Brett Roberts and Credit
Acceptance Corporation, et al.?
4. Do the decisions of the Honorable Zahid N. Quraishi, U.S.D.J, a democratically appointed
justice, who disregards the laws of the State of New Jersey; violates the rights of Pro Se
self-represented litigants; and disregards both the holdings made by stare decisis by the Supreme
Court of the United States as well as the provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9
U.S.C. §2 to help corporate entities make the entirety of the judicial system appear to
intentionally select to whom the law will unequally be applicable based on the status of the
individual(s)?
5. Will the lower courts ' decisions made by the justices in the instant case at the U. S. Court of
Appeals for the Third Circuit and at the United States District Court for the Third District
justices rulings against and the decision to affirm the ruling be a gateway for other cases to usurp
the holdings of the Supreme Court of the United States when it has already tried, heard the
appeals and upheld its decisional law that an arbitrator does not have jurisdiction over
'unconscionable ' claims against the whole arbitration clause agreement which must be referred
to the court?
Is the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit allowed to substitute its decision(s) and overrule the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. §81-16 at §2 in the instant case in opposition to the rulings of the Supreme Court of the United States holdings?